These people should be jailed for criminal negligence - Asset Protection Associate CPKC Employee Review

1.0
25 June 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are no pros at CPKC

Cons

Common practices in the track maintenance division: -submitting fraudulent paperwork to Transport Canada. For example, fudging CWR reports to hide rail being added. This was encouraged by management. - covering up various classes and urgencies of defects. For example, hitting high spikes down in shifted track and gooping around the spikes to make it appear to be done properly. Or putting broken bolts back in joint bar holes. -Time theft. For example, getting together after a weekend job to ensure everyones extra hours added matches everyone else's hours. Literally tens of thousands of dollars stolen each year - generally being pro-derailment ($$$) -bad behavior- playing chicken with traffic, dropping gates in high traffic for fun, stealing from homeless encampments, waving traffic through unprotected crossings, removing joint bars from life track, the list is endless - general lack of knowledge eg. Creating defects while *trying* to remove them because they don't actually know what they're doing -patrolling without looking at the track. The idea is, if they can't see a defect, they don't have to fix it or have the guilt of seeing it and not fixing it. They don't want to see defects so they don't look. Even if they see something and don't fix it, it can't be proven they saw it. There's literally no reason to work (because the threat of potential derailment/loss of life/environment destruction have no effect on them) -fradulently signing off that crossing circuits are working properly -Fradulently signing off on log books. It might be different now because it's digital. But they drive trucks not suited for the road and don't follow safety procedure/paperwork for their.Class DZ license -management knows all this happens These people need to be fired or jailed. Keep in mind, a lot of this stuff occurs in densely populated areas (not that you'd want a derailment EVER.. but you get what I mean). One day, lots of people will die. They can only be so reckless for so long before something happens. It's inevitable. A two mile long train carrying hazardous materials and moving at track speed will encounter an improperly installed frog/neglected TEC/Sperry defect/hanging crossing (ie. Not something 'accidental'). It will be dinner time in a Highly populated residential neighborhood when families are sitting down to eat. Track Maintenance will put up their hands and say 'it wasn't me' knowing full well that even if it was, no one will ever know. Then they'll happily restore the track and buy that new snowmobile with the overtime they put in fixing the track. Truly respectable family men.

Explore other reviews about CPKC

5.0
20 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great pay, and benefits, good environment,

Cons

First 3-5 years stressful until you get familiar and understand how railroads work.

1
2.0
29 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of opportunities to provide value

Cons

Poor leadership at the C-level. CIO has no control over the direction of the IT landscape beyond what is dictated to her by the CEO and other business owners. The IT environment is almost solely controlled by the demands of the business at the cost of being able to manage and adapt to needs. 20 years behind the market in the adoption of cloud technology. Existing cloud strategy was built by engineers pressed into the role of architects and learning as they progressed along. No automation or DevOps presence whatsoever outside what the platform teams use to simplify their own workloads. Remote work is considered a 4-letter word and is extremely frowned upon as anything other than an as-needed and pre-approved option. Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery are still done using backups and shadow copies of key infrastructure, and those key systems are decided upon at the time the tests are planned instead of testing the company's infrastructure in its entirety. Data centers are geographically separated, but are significantly disparate in what is physically hosted and accessible. Recognition and rewards are overtly encouraged, but are covertly handed out based on the level of visibility and impact to the business and stakeholders. Senior leadership constantly touts open-door policy and approachability, but give off vibes and impressions opposite of the overt policy. The company puts on a show of being diverse and inclusive. Case in point, the hiring of a female CIO. The problem is that working within an 'old boys network' leadership, it doesn't matter how inclusive and diverse the company appears because those elements are never given the opportunity to show their value.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All