employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Catalyst Public Schools

Is this your company?

One star is too many. - Teaching Fellow Catalyst Public Schools Employee Review

1.0
22 Dec 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Colleagues, working with kids, making a difference.

Cons

Staff is underworked and underpaid. Founders avoided paying overtime for three years and when someone alerted them to the problem, they changed hours for the following year in case they were caught. All staff underneath the founders are micromanaged, even part of the "senior leadership" team, and if the founders don't like you (literally, not because of your performance), they will find a way to make life harder for you or let you go. Management treats educated grown adults like children. Management was never there and when other people stepped in to do their job, those stepping up were reprimanded.

Explore other reviews about Catalyst Public Schools

5.0
7 Feb 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great team and students to work with.

Cons

None that I can think of.

1.0
8 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Catalyst began with a strong vision: to create equitable, innovative learning spaces for all students. Many educators here are deeply passionate, mission-driven, and committed to students’ success. There is genuine care among colleagues, and many staff members work tirelessly to meet the needs of students and families.

Cons

Unfortunately, the implementation of Catalyst’s mission has often fallen short of its stated values and has provided a clear example of why Charter Schools have the reputations they do. During my time at the school, I and several colleagues experienced a lack of consistent support around student behavior, staff safety, and workload sustainability. When safety concerns were raised, including repeated physical aggression from students against staff, the responses from the administration, specifically the co-founders, often minimized, deflected, or ignored rather than addressed the concerns. The leadership structure is heavily centralized, and decision-making frequently lacks transparency or collaboration. Several staff who voiced concerns experienced dismissal or subtle retaliation. This pattern was clear in the 24-25 school year when approximately 40% of the staff resigned or were terminated. Staff turnover has been high since the school’s founding, and this pattern continues to impact both culture and continuity of learning.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All