employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Charles River Analytics

Is this your company?

Disorganized and potentially toxic -- proceed with caution - Anonymous employee Charles River Analytics Employee Review

2.0
22 Dec 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Casual work culture, potentially interesting projects,

Cons

There seems to be a bit of a divide between scientists and engineers. As an engineer, I often felt like more of a tool at the disposal of scientists rather than an employee with thoughts and feelings to voice. On more than one occasion, I was assigned to a project for which I lacked the appropriate skills, even after voicing my concerns. Generally, I am very willing to learn new skills to accomplish tasks, but considering the amount of time I was given and the scope of the projects, I felt like I was set up for failure. Projects are often poorly planned, too ambitious, and lack direction. As a result, I was often expected to work extra hours at the ends of projects to try and compensate for the poor planning at the beginning. Project leads often failed to communicate all the details of projects to me, leaving me with a fragmented view of the end goal. People often work and send emails over the weekend, setting the expectation that I do the same. When I gave my two weeks notice, I was met with passive aggressiveness and felt largely ignored and even a bit antagonized as I tried to finish up my remaining work.

Explore other reviews about Charles River Analytics

5.0
20 May 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

CRA is a great company to work with. The flexibility, and overall company culture is hard to find these days.

Cons

Management should reach check in with employees more often.

4.0
28 June 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

R&D environment with many small projects and ‘all hands on deck’ culture is good for gaining exposure to new technologies, building up a diverse skillset and learning about the business side of R&D. Opportunities for self-direction and ownership for enthusiastic proposal writers. Excellent opportunity for early career engineers/scientists hoping to build up a technical foundation.

Cons

As the company’s bread & butter, R&D proposal wins are King, and technical excellence is valued only insofar as it enables these wins. Funding opportunities are typically small and fragmented, rarely offering room for achieving the critical mass needed to truly create something of lasting value/impact. Good for research and learning, poor for developing products. The company has made unusual decisions regarding the administration of its IT infrastructure in a bid to mimic their expectation of how larger defense primes would operate, sacrificing development speed and thereby one of the few advantages a small business has over larger established players. The company has become highly adverse to taking on risk, and which is a major hurdle to growth.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All