I'm not sure if I should count this as a pro: it is a very interesting study ground to investigate further the Dunning-Kruger effect. In the early days when Climeworks was strongly dependent on equity funding and had to be frugal with spending, only cheaper less experienced people could be afforded. Those people stayed and now shifted up in hierarchy but the experience did not evolve in time. It is sometimes infuriating as an employee if you look for guidance and growth in order to evolve yourself; it is difficult, next to impossible, to find (depending on the team though, there are better and worse). Feedback upwards is also not requested by leaders and if given on a voluntary basis, more ignored than taken into consideration. There is also a lot of politics in here. You have to know who to talk to in order to get things moving. My conclusion: if you want to grow and make something out of yourself and your career I would most certainly keep the fingers off Climeworks. If you don't mind and you are defined by the purpose then go for it.
