Not Good - Vice President Product Management Crossover for Work Employee Review

2.0
30 July 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Crossover does require work from home. For many, this is a good thing and, for me, helped productivity. The salary is good, but depending upon your country's tax situation it might not be as good as it seems on the surface.

Cons

Where do I start? I tried to be objective with my 2-star rating; Crossover isn't unethical or stealing from their employees or anything like that. However, for a seasoned professional, be warned... I joined in one of the Very High Dollar executive-level positions being driven by their desire to acquire 50+ companies in the near term. I'm in the US. As such (and I knew this going in), the tax consequences for being a contractor are non-trivial. There's also the consideration that you must fund any perks yourself - healthcare, retirement, etc. While the salary is generous enough to do that, it's not as shiny as it seems on the surface. Your mileage may vary depending upon your home country. What I really disliked: Constant tracking/ justification of work stream. Seriously. As others have pointed out, it's difficult to actually *get* credit for a full work week without working extra. Especially in some of the higher-level, more 'creative' positions such as architect, product management, etc. there's minimal or no opportunity to review or think over things. For me, I work in bursts followed by small distractions in which I'm running the problems in the background of my thoughts. A variety of coworkers and management in my history have almost universally commented about the volume of good work I produce. Even my peers at Crossover had no problem with the quantity or quality of my production. However, their tracking software and systems simply don't credit anything other than linear, constant "work". This was bad for me, resulting in me working extra, reworking things as I attempting to change my processes, "faking" it, or simply working longer to attempt to make my hours. I also felt bad for some of the more junior or "factory" positions. It really is tracked by the minute, with lots of incentive to find "problems" with productivity. This is really a thinly-veiled method of wringing blood out of a turnip, by finding flaws or gaps and essentially docking pay. Yeah, the salaries are good but the amount of ancillary work that goes into making "real" hours is awful, and I felt like a chump contributing to it. I had to quit for my sanity.

avatar
Crossover for Work Response
7y
We appreciate your review. Our wages are paid in USD, so it's not going to be as competitive in high tech markets like San Francisco or Boston in the United States where software development is ultra-competitive. However, wages for the same jobs are very competitive in other US cities and outside the US. Sometimes these wages can be 5-6x the local average. Our business model is unique and isn't for everyone. We aren't trying to be like everyone else. The future of work is being redefined. We pride ourselves in being a pioneer in this new paradigm. If you want to know more about this work model, you can read about it here: https://medium.com/@crossoverforwork/the-factory-model-enabling-massive-scale-across-business-functions-98b18ad574f8

Explore other reviews about Crossover for Work

5.0
24 July 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work ability was nice!

Cons

Some shifts were rigid for emoloyees

avatar
Crossover for Work Response
10mo
Hey, thanks for the stellar review!
2.0
9 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The boots-on-the-ground people who make up the teams are fantastic. The vision of what they are trying to accomplish is also commendable.

Cons

Leadership makes it almost impossible to make headway. They don't stick with any one system long enough to get it to its full potential. Their content practices are shady. If you don't deliver "yesterday", you are made to feel your job is on the line, even though the entire team is working overtime to achieve their crazy timelines. Their expectations of how quickly quality work can be done are out of whack. They test their new software and content on the students. As an educator, I find this out of line. Content and software should be "student-ready" before it is released to them. OH! And, the owner likes to scrap weeks/months of work already completed to ensure the students and staff have what they need for a successful school year, just one or two days before school starts! Then, proceeds to put pressure on the academic team to "fix it." (He has done this two years in a row now.) Very toxic leadership.

avatar
Crossover for Work Response
7mo
Thanks for taking the time to share this. From the details you mention (students, school-year timing, curriculum decisions), it sounds like your experience was with the school/program you worked for—not with Crossover. This page is for reviews of Crossover as a recruiting platform. If you have feedback about your direct interactions with Crossover (our hiring process, assessments, communications, or support), we'd love to hear about it. For concerns about the school’s leadership or content policies, those are best directed to that organization. We appreciate you speaking up and want to make sure feedback gets to the right place.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All