If you’re a employee Contract employees will do more work than you - Construction Manager Crown Castle Employee Review

1.0
20 Nov 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ok pay great benefits company car , bonuses (not this year)

Cons

Well where do I begin what happened to crown castle ? They bought all these fiber companies and bled money to light tower. Then what didn’t make sense was that they had internal splicers and they still uses contract vendors to perform the work. Small cell contract employees were often used in the field more often than employees of Crown.. Employees of Crown Castle were always working by the “B3” values and when they turned thing in that were wrong they were told not to say anything and were often intimidated and targeted by project managers. So often project managers would find a way to write you up make false allegations and even lie about employees. Just recently Crown terminated 250+ employees so i would not say your job is safe any longer everyone has a target on their back. Good luck to the ones that lost their jobs one week before a holiday sad Elliot capital has pushed this place to a breaking point

Explore other reviews about Crown Castle

5.0
23 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work. Although there has been a lot of change over the past few years, I feel the company is back on track. Culture has been dramatically improved.

Cons

Not much at this time. Still lots of change ahead though as the company transforms into a tower focused company.

1.0
11 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Depending on who is running your team (I’ve had 3 different team leads in the 3 years that I’ve been a full time employee,) some have provided great mentoring, and have taught me a lot.

Cons

Job security is extremely unstable, and employees often feel like they are one decision away from becoming part of another layoff statistic. In my experience, women were not always treated equitably compared to their male counterparts, depending heavily on the leadership structure within the department. The company also showed limited willingness to accommodate health conditions, often searching for loopholes to minimize support, assistance, or benefits during times when employees and their families needed them most. Leadership roles often felt transactional and tied directly to the company’s immediate operational goals. For example, when a department needed growth, leadership would bring in individuals with strong industry relationships, connections, and expertise to help expand profitability and establish the department. However, once those goals were achieved and the leader’s network or strategic value had been fully utilized, the company would frequently move on from them—either through reassignment or termination—in favor of the next person who fit the company’s evolving objectives. Overall, the culture created an environment where many employees felt expendable rather than valued long-term.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All