employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

DSO National Laboratories

Is this your company?

Good fresh grad pay - Member of Technical Staff(MTS) DSO National Laboratories Employee Review

3.0
18 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good starting pay. MAY have work life balance depending on which division you land in. Most seniors are easy to communicate with and willing to teach. Stable even in poor economy, similar to government agencies.

Cons

Career progression is snail, esp if your highest qualification is bachelor degree, unless you are super exceptional and more importantly your boss SEEs your value (no see no count). Don't expect good WLB for most technical roles, if you want WLB with relatively faster promotion go to DSTA (same starting pay, or better in certain roles). Get ready to be tanned. Abundance of red tapes, be careful of where you thread. Niche line of work, be here for 5 years and you are in for the rest of your life. If you want promotion, and is willing to stay for the rest of your career life, recommend to go for masters. 9/10 principal engineers and above hold master's/phd. Last note, DSO is not a stat board / public service, it is a considered a private company, thus no civil servant bonus.

Explore other reviews about DSO National Laboratories

5.0
17 Jan 2024
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- A lot of freedom, seated away from supervisor and together with other interns - Accepts pre-u students, so do feel free to try applying - Food from cafeteria is nice

Cons

- some higher-ups are older and more traditional, difficult to communicate with

5.0
21 Sept 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great working hours and thorough review process. Employees get to decide what 8 or 9-hour span of the day they prefer to work during, and are not required to adhere to a fixed 8am-5pm schedule. Each employee typically work on a few different projects every year. These different projects are often managed by different project leads (PLs). During the yearly performance reviews, these different PLs would convene and rate the performance of an individual. Performance reviews are carried out by multiple supervisors, and everyone is ranked based on collective inputs of the whole management team. As such, this allows John and Peter to be compared on a somewhat similar scale even though they have not been on the same team together.

Cons

Engineering and Applied science oriented, and might not be suited for people who are more focused on curiosity-driven research.

13
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All