Poor pay for what it is. - Analyst DTCC Employee Review

2.0
2 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Exposure to the US money markets. Can be kept busy depending on department.

Cons

Pay is atrocious for what it is you're doing depending on your position. For example some analyst roles don't go beyond £28k which is way below what you should expect compared to other places and the work you do. It can be stressful and it can be frustrating some of the work you do only to be paid miniscule compensation for your labour. I am of course only talking about Wrexham site.

Explore other reviews about DTCC

5.0
17 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very good work culture at dtcc

Cons

not many cons at dtcc

4.0
5 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Internal Audit's work is meaningful and provides strong exposure across risk, technology and operations. Audits tend to focus on areas that truly matter from a regulatory and risk perspective, so you're not just checking boxes. There is a genuinely strong team culture. Colleagues are competent, collaborative, and willing to help, with a good mix of experience levels that make it a solid environment for learning. There is also clear investment in employee development. Managers often have regular career discussions, and there are ongoing efforts around training, including newer areas like AI tools and capabilities. Recognition is present, and people are generally acknowledged for strong performance. Overall, it's a strong place to build audit fundamentals, gain exposure to innovation initiatives, and develop credibility within financial services / internal audit.

Cons

Internal Audit's workload is consistently high, not just during peak periods. It's common to juggle multiple audits with overlapping deadlines, alongside continuous monitoring and other responsibilities, which can make it difficult at times. Processes can be very documentation heavy and sometimes feel rigid, which is expected in a highly regulated environment but can reduce efficiency. A significant amount of time can go into formatting, reviewing and aligning work papers to methodology. Some workflows remain manual, which adds to the overall pressure and limit efficiency.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All