Half good half bad. - Manager DTCC Employee Review

3.0
25 May 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get exposure to the backbone of the U.S. Financial system; a unique experience you will not get anywhere else.

Cons

It's a very click driven place and the departments are generally run by vps who have been there a long time, have great knowledge about there specific area but are not very good at cultivating talent. If you're able to BS your way into the in crowd you'll be fine, especially if you're a white male. These vps have been there so long that it would be difficult to add value elsewhere. They tout diversity but when you look at every level, it's not so.

Explore other reviews about DTCC

5.0
17 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very good work culture at dtcc

Cons

not many cons at dtcc

4.0
5 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Internal Audit's work is meaningful and provides strong exposure across risk, technology and operations. Audits tend to focus on areas that truly matter from a regulatory and risk perspective, so you're not just checking boxes. There is a genuinely strong team culture. Colleagues are competent, collaborative, and willing to help, with a good mix of experience levels that make it a solid environment for learning. There is also clear investment in employee development. Managers often have regular career discussions, and there are ongoing efforts around training, including newer areas like AI tools and capabilities. Recognition is present, and people are generally acknowledged for strong performance. Overall, it's a strong place to build audit fundamentals, gain exposure to innovation initiatives, and develop credibility within financial services / internal audit.

Cons

Internal Audit's workload is consistently high, not just during peak periods. It's common to juggle multiple audits with overlapping deadlines, alongside continuous monitoring and other responsibilities, which can make it difficult at times. Processes can be very documentation heavy and sometimes feel rigid, which is expected in a highly regulated environment but can reduce efficiency. A significant amount of time can go into formatting, reviewing and aligning work papers to methodology. Some workflows remain manual, which adds to the overall pressure and limit efficiency.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All