Pros
One of the biggest strengths of the company is the engineering team. The engineers I worked with were highly skilled, knowledgeable, supportive, and genuinely collaborative. There was a strong culture of helping each other, sharing knowledge, and solving difficult technical problems together. For engineers who want exposure to different technologies and responsibilities, the company can provide opportunities to develop a broad range of skills.
Cons
Unfortunately, the quality of leadership has declined significantly under the current executive management. There appears to be a growing disconnect between leadership decisions and the realities of engineering work. New initiatives and priorities are frequently introduced without a clear strategy, resulting in constant shifts in direction and unrealistic expectations. There is also a strong emphasis on appearances, metrics, presentations, and status reporting rather than measurable product quality or long-term technical success. In many cases, demonstrating activity seems to be valued more than delivering a reliable and well-designed product. This has contributed to declining morale and increased frustration across teams. The return-to-office mandate is another example. Employees were required to spend more time in the office, but there was little evidence that this improved productivity, collaboration, or product outcomes. Instead, office attendance appeared to become a performance metric in itself. The company has also brought in several new leaders and managers whose qualifications and understanding of the existing products and engineering challenges. As a result, engineering teams are often expected to meet aggressive timelines that do not reflect technical realities. The work environment has become increasingly stressful and unpredictable. Employees frequently feel pressure to adapt to rapidly changing priorities, making long-term planning difficult. Open disagreement with leadership decisions is often discouraged, and constructive feedback is not always welcomed. Compensation is another concern. Salaries are generally below market rates, and although employees were given indications that compensation adjustments would be made, those expectations were ultimately not met. I would recommend this company for the opportunity to work alongside talented engineers, but I would not recommend it to candidates seeking strong leadership, stability, competitive compensation, or a healthy engineering culture.