More Pay - Direct Support Professional (DSP) Dungarvin Employee Review

1.0
31 Mar 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Helping the clients achieve their goals is always a great feeling for those who are there supporting. - Access to daily pay is plus also

Cons

Pay rate isn’t enough. The clients are very high risk. Office doesn’t even care whenever you are injured.

avatar
Dungarvin Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your review. Dungarvin tries to regularly review market compensation within our programs, aligning wages based on Medicaid reimbursement rates as well as a variety of other factors. We understand that our direct support professionals are the cornerstone of our business and we value your feedback. Please contact us at HR@dungarvin.com to discuss how we can better support you as a valued member of our team!

Explore other reviews about Dungarvin

5.0
1 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good Management at this company

Cons

There are none I can think of

1.0
15 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The clients are great and the best part about the job.

Cons

Management and Training Deficiencies Ineffective Leadership: On-site management consistently fails to engage in direct training or oversight. Supervisory duties are frequently abdicated to senior staff members who lack formal training authority, leading to inconsistent onboarding. Lack of Professional Development: Management is unresponsive to internal mobility requests and fails to honor promised compensation structures. Pay increases are routinely delayed or ignored, requiring excessive self-advocacy from staff. Hostile Work Environment: There is a culture of verbal discouragement and professional "berating," particularly when staff members address exhaustion or request standard time off. Operational and Clinical Mismanagement Medication Errors: There is a recurring pattern of medication mismanagement. Rather than addressing systemic flaws, management shifts culpability onto individual staff members when discrepancies are reported. Neglect of Client Care: Management has repeatedly declined to seek necessary medical intervention for clients (e.g., insomnia treatments), leading to unsafe conditions for both the client and the staff member on duty. Dishonest Reporting: Documentation regarding client activities and milestones is frequently falsified or significantly embellished, misrepresenting the actual quality of care provided. Ethical Violations and Safety Concerns Unsafe Behavioral Interventions: I witnessed multiple instances of staff using inappropriate and unauthorized redirection methods, including the use of spray bottles and unnecessary physical force. Inadequate Emergency Support: During overnight crises, administrative guidance was negligent. I was once advised to leave a distressed client outside at 1:00 AM rather than receiving actionable assistance. Retaliatory Conduct: Following my resignation, management engaged in unprofessional behavior by contacting me via personal social media platforms to deliver threats regarding future employability.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All