Unique academic environment promotes innovation and opportunity to personally influence organizational outcomes. - Technology Researcher, Project Director ETS Employee Review

5.0
23 July 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Academic culture of diverse, self-directed, highly motivated, cooperative, smart, professional staff. A non-profit organization with a "higher purpose" driving achievement, growth, global expansion and mission. Great environment for autonomy, innovation, creative thinking and upward mobility for qualified leaders in their fields. Broad spectrum of business and academic roles encourage multi-discipline approaches to team and project building and opportunities to grow personal knowledge and expertise while achieving mission-driven corporate (and project) objectives.

Cons

Despite one's own record of achievement, performance, long-term service, relevance of contributions in key strategic mission-central projects, or professional status -- unless that level is VP or higher -- the company offers nothing in terms of ongoing benefits or support if an employee is forced to stop working due to illness and a resulting permanent disability. That's not to say that LTD disability insurance (which offers limited coverage and benefits) is not made available to everyone, but once even the most long-term, high-achiever finds him or herself in that position, all benefits that are critical to support, sustain and even continue to improve their quality of life, or any chance of staying on course toward a sustainable financial future and retirement... is completely taken away. This policy and practice is ruinous and totally incongruous with the culture of compassion and support they claim to practice and possess.

Explore other reviews about ETS

5.0
5 Mar 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ETS have a group of outstanding researchers

Cons

like all other industries, it has to face AI impacts

1.0
22 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Support of immediate management and coworkers makes coming to work every day a pleasure.

Cons

Where to start... First, the employee performance evaluation process and methodology has changed from 1) performance vs your job description to 2) OKRs which were completely unattainable and meaningless at every level to 3) rocks and outcomes which again have very little to do with the day to day jobs of most employees. It seems the burden for goals and objectives and performance management has shifted from management to employees as they try to define a methodology that holds only doers responsible for the company's success. All this since Amit Sevak took over. Management manipulated the questions in a recent employee survey to force responses that made it look like there was improvement year over year. Of course, when you add a new President between the employees and the CEO peoples opinion of senior management is improved. Of course when you shift the focus to immediate management from senior management, the responses will be improved. Try issuing the exact same survey as the prior year and see how much "real" improvement there was in the numbers.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All