Don't do it - Anonymous employee Exposure Employee Review

1.0
9 Oct 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Cool offices and good brands within portfolio Sometimes you get free stuff The team is diverse in some aspects

Cons

Senior leadership has clear favourites Always say yes to clients, even if story is bad and won't land. Then when doesn't land leadership is angry at tea Absolutely no onboarding on clients (either how to manage them best / intel on what they like OR on the brands / past work etc.) so context is hard is not impossible to get Requests for feedback are ignored from senior team so difficult to know if you're doing a good / ok or bad job Will do anything to keep clients, but will still loose them to better agencies who follow through. Someone described it as bleeding accounts left and right

Explore other reviews about Exposure

5.0
2 Mar 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very creative, autonomy, family atmosphere, great brands

Cons

None that I can think of

1.0
9 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The agency offers solid health insurance benefits through its UK-based parent group, which is a notable advantage. There are opportunities to work with a few well-known brands and gain meaningful client exposure early on. This could be a suitable environment for recent graduates looking to build experience and use the role as a stepping stone to strengthen their CV.

Cons

The organization is significantly hindered by poor leadership and a highly political environment, where recognition of individual contributions is rare to nonexistent. Decision-making is concentrated and often driven by internal dynamics rather than sound business strategy, resulting in a lack of clear direction and limited confidence in the company’s future. There is a notable absence of proper onboarding or structured support for new hires, setting employees up to struggle from the outset. Management quality is a major concern — many individuals in leadership roles lack the experience and capability required, which contributes to a consistently unprofessional, and more often than not, a toxic workplace environment. The internal culture further exacerbates these issues. Gossip and unproductive discussion about both clients and team members are commonplace and appear to be tolerated, if not encouraged, by leadership. This creates a lack of trust and undermines team cohesion. Operationally, the agency is severely understaffed, placing excessive strain on employees and impacting overall performance. From a business standpoint, the agency struggles to win new business, losing far more pitches than it converts, which raises concerns about long-term viability. While there is underlying potential, meaningful improvement would require substantial leadership changes, a reset of company culture, and a serious investment in both talent and structure.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All