Strong business, weak leadership and a culture built on favouritism - Middle Management Role Flagstone Employee Review

2.0
13 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The product has genuine market strength - There are highly capable, hardworking people across teams - Only need to be in the office once a week

Cons

Over the past 18 months, trust in leadership and confidence in internal processes have dropped significantly, and the shift’s been noticeable across the business. Performance reviews, promotions and pay are tied to a calibration process employees can’t see into and aren’t given clarity on. Decisions are made privately, criteria are vague, and outcomes often aren’t properly explained. Ratings don’t feel performance-based; they feel decided. Employees don’t get meaningful input into their own reviews, so outcomes depend heavily on how well a manager knows your work. If you’ve had a manager change during the year, that alone can affect your rating simply because they don’t have enough context. Promotion’s tied to this same system, and it shows. Advancement doesn’t feel consistently merit-based. Pay transparency’s been talked about internally for over two years, yet salary bandings still haven’t been published, and discussing pay’s discouraged. That combination makes it hard to trust that decisions are fair. Favouritism is a widely recognised issue internally. Several recent hires into influential roles have direct links to leadership from previous companies, while strong internal candidates struggle to even get interviews. The pattern’s obvious and widely discussed, and it seriously undermines trust in how hiring and progression decisions are made. It’s hard to ignore once you’ve seen it happen more than once. Relationships clearly influence outcomes. Employees who regularly socialise with senior staff outside of work tend to progress faster than those who focus purely on performance. The environment rewards visibility and social alignment more than results, which creates a clear bias toward extroverted personalities. This isn’t something people whisper about, it’s widely recognised across teams. Psychological safety is a real concern. Staff are encouraged to be open and honest, yet speaking candidly can later count against you, especially when “values” are assessed. The result’s predictable: people stop speaking up. Turnover and tenure are now a structural risk. Over 60% of employees have been at the company less than two years, which has created knowledge gaps and increased pressure on those who remain. A large amount of experience has left (or been forced out), and the impact’s visible day to day. Feedback mostly flows one way. Direction comes from the top, but honest upward feedback isn’t consistently welcomed or acted on. That limits improvement and discourages initiative. Workloads are heavy, overtime’s common in some teams, and recognition or pay adjustment doesn’t always follow.

avatar
Flagstone Response
3mo
Thank you for taking the time to write this. It's detailed and direct, and it deserves a genuine response rather than a formulaic one. We are a values-led organisation, which means we hold ourselves accountable when our actions don't match our intentions. Some of what you've described reflects a period of significant growth and transition — we grew our headcount by 30% in 2025, and we're honest enough to acknowledge that scale of growth brings real organisational challenge. Processes, communication, and culture all come under pressure when a business expands at that pace, and we put every effort into making every part of that journey as smooth as it could be. On performance and calibration: our new performance framework was built directly from feedback from across the business. Our intent was clear — make the process more inclusive, reduce unconscious bias, and create something more transparent for everyone going through it. In practice that means clearer criteria, more meaningful input, and a calibration process that is objective and less dependent on individual manager context. It represents a genuine step forward from where we were, and we'll keep evolving it. We're committed to merit-based advancement and we take seriously the perception — and reality — that relationships can influence outcomes. Perception shapes culture as much as intent does, and we're looking closely at how we assess internal candidates and communicate decisions. We have invested a significant amount into diversity and inclusivity over the past 24 months, and we continue to do so – and likewise, we are continuing to evolve our internal mobility process. On pay transparency, our Engineering salary bandings are going live now - a first step, not a final one. By the end of 2026, all of our salary bands will be published which is an important step for us – we want to be ahead of the curve, but most importantly, we want to build high levels of trust – a fundamental part of our culture. If people feel that speaking honestly is later used against them, that is a direct failure of our values, and I’m disappointed to hear that we have failed you here and not created the necessary psychological safety. We are driving a high-performance culture and feedback is openly encouraged, both ways, across the business. Your feedback helps us identify where the gap exists. We will continue to invest here. We recognise that rapid scaling can create the feeling of instability, and we're mindful of the knowledge and continuity pressures that come with bringing a large number of new people into the business in a short period of time. That's something we're actively managing, and we have been fortunate, through targeted investment, for our turnover to remain stable, even throughout the period of significant headcount growth. I’m sorry that you had a poor experience with us, and I’m especially sorry given we pride ourselves on our culture. We take this feedback as a challenge to close the gap between our values and our practice — and we welcome direct conversations with anyone who wants to engage constructively.

Explore other reviews about Flagstone

1.0
23 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company appears to have achieved what many organisations consider impossible... creating bureaucracy while maintaining startup levels of chaos.

Cons

Engineering culture can be surprisingly hostile. Discussions frequently become dominated by the loudest, most cynical voices rather than the most constructive ones. Collaboration often resembles an intellectual cage fight where the prize is winning an argument nobody needed to have. Morale is predictably poor. An eNPS score of approximately -80 does not feel like a metric requiring further investigation. Excessive pessimism and negativity make it difficult for motivated engineers to remain motivated.

2
5.0
12 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Culture - a caring and supportive environment. Regular engagement and inclusion activities, giving back opportunities and general fun. Ambitious - always striving to improve and iterate through a number of initiatives across the organisation

Cons

With ambition comes regular and often intense change. This isn’t an environment for everyone.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All