employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Atomics

Is this your company?

Nice people across the company, HR is not a well-run department. - Human Resources Business Partner General Atomics Employee Review

2.0
20 May 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice people, 9x80 schedule, they generally care about employees, usually good work- life balance. Moderate pay to start, but very small increases there after.

Cons

HR leadership is completely ineffective, unavailable, don't allow their highly capable teams to make any decisions, and they hold on to actions and requests for many many weeks. They don't communicate (HR employees are seemingly always the last to know what's going on). We are on the mid to low end of pay, no career development. Reports to legal, who have minimal employment law background and won't engage with HR but many actions have to go through them.

Explore other reviews about General Atomics

5.0
8 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very good work life balance

Cons

9 hour shifts 4 days a week

3.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mostly good people and skilled engineers that are easy to work with and great to learn from across all groups/locations. There is opportunity to pursue technical areas of interest and to stand out by leading improvement efforts. The company is flexible and often facilitates changes according to interest. Sense of job security generally feels good and stable, the greater GA really backs the Space division. The greater company works on some really interesting and cool things, beyond just defense. Pay is pretty good. Experience with most middle management (of engineers) has been positive, they typically advocate and support their employees.

Cons

Unsure of division leadership and strategic direction. Overall impression is that engineers' perspectives are not adequately weighted in both proposals and certain decisions for active missions. Processes burden performance, though there is intention for constant improvement. Ignoring engineering concerns (i.e. with schedule) + process burdens often result in delays and increased pressure, and therefore a less than ideal working environment at times. Overtime pay is not guaranteed but can be approved. Working with teams in different locations can lead to tension and "silo-ing" (though not always). Space division is becoming mostly defense focused (an industry trend), but would be nice to continue work in the civil earth and space science arena. They also demo'd a nice cafeteria/gathering space for more work/equipment space.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All