employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Atomics

Is this your company?

Great Company, cares about their employees - Program Manager III General Atomics Employee Review

5.0
22 Aug 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They work hard to keep employees happy. 9/80 work schedule (every other Friday off), recreation facilities (gyms, pickleball court, baseball diamond), cafeteria's in most buildings, regular townhall meetings with Senior Leadership with unfiltered Q&As, Free Electric Vehicle charging stations, slow to layoff in down years (aka covid), they try to promote from within, good benefits, pension, tuition reimbursement, the pay is fair, plenty of training opportunities.

Cons

Run largely by older white men, they were one of the last companies to allow telework and they are slowly moving back towards having people in office full time again, Sometimes they are slow to hire because they are also slow to cut when there's less work. This can mean heavier work loads (but not always), processes seem to keep changing all the time. Lots of bureaucracy and red tape can suck up too much time taking away from value added work

Explore other reviews about General Atomics

5.0
8 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very good work life balance

Cons

9 hour shifts 4 days a week

3.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mostly good people and skilled engineers that are easy to work with and great to learn from across all groups/locations. There is opportunity to pursue technical areas of interest and to stand out by leading improvement efforts. The company is flexible and often facilitates changes according to interest. Sense of job security generally feels good and stable, the greater GA really backs the Space division. The greater company works on some really interesting and cool things, beyond just defense. Pay is pretty good. Experience with most middle management (of engineers) has been positive, they typically advocate and support their employees.

Cons

Unsure of division leadership and strategic direction. Overall impression is that engineers' perspectives are not adequately weighted in both proposals and certain decisions for active missions. Processes burden performance, though there is intention for constant improvement. Ignoring engineering concerns (i.e. with schedule) + process burdens often result in delays and increased pressure, and therefore a less than ideal working environment at times. Overtime pay is not guaranteed but can be approved. Working with teams in different locations can lead to tension and "silo-ing" (though not always). Space division is becoming mostly defense focused (an industry trend), but would be nice to continue work in the civil earth and space science arena. They also demo'd a nice cafeteria/gathering space for more work/equipment space.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All