good tech, cheap culture - Account Executive Glean (CA) Employee Review

3.0
18 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* good tech * strong growth for a SaaS company (100 to 250M ARR in 2025) * likely exit (acquisition is rumored)

Cons

* layoffs and comp issues among sales team. layoffs happen more than you want and affect morale but if you're performing not an issue. comp issues are a pattern that has led to talent leakage and is more concerning. * questions of tech relevance with MCP, agents, and an architecture built on an index * annoying but worth noting: many roles and systems/processes are outsourced to India, which can lead to a subpar employee experience

Explore other reviews about Glean (CA)

5.0
17 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Fun and impactful product to work on. 2. Business growing exponentially. Marquee customer base. 3. Lots to learn.

Cons

1. AI space is getting noisy. If you can't compete, this is not the industry to be in.

1.0
27 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pros: Office snacks, work location, and friendly coworkers. The SE organization also has strong hiring managers. There can be some lack of direction and occasional chaos, which may be expected at a Series F stage company.

Cons

Cons: • Lack of structure and clear processes for KPIs, with decision-making at times feeling influenced by internal politics. • In my experience, leadership within the GTM organization appeared relatively inexperienced, which created challenges in execution and alignment. • Promotions at times seemed influenced by relationships rather than purely performance-based outcomes. • High employee turnover, under-resourced teams, and ongoing budget constraints made it difficult to operate effectively. • Career progression and role expectations could feel inconsistent, with rapid title changes not always aligned with experience. • Remote and in-office expectations felt misaligned, particularly across different office locations, leading to confusion around the purpose of in-person attendance. • Workplace morale could be low, with employees feeling the need to be overly cautious in communication and feedback. • Feedback and communication styles were not always received consistently across team members, which may have impacted inclusivity and openness. • Success could feel highly dependent on manager relationships, regardless of individual performance or hiring outcomes. • Limited clarity around ownership and collaboration among recruiters, including candidate and role ownership, which sometimes led to overlapping efforts without clear credit or accountability.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All