Fair pay, great benefits, horrible culture - Executive Assistant HBO Max Employee Review

great team, diversity, learned different skills including UI, awesome boss at the time

i was only an intern and they had me for a max of 2 terms

The chance to work on IPs. WFH friendly. Benefits are okay. HBO is a well-known name.

Management and Leadership Issues: While some teams and leaders at the company are positive, certain teams suffer from a highly toxic environment. Favoritism: There is noticeable favoritism in certain teams. Certain individuals are given significant flexibility with (seemingly unlimited) PTO, even at short notice or when undesirable work comes up. Low-effort work is often rewarded for favorites, while other team members are consistently overloaded, overworked, under appreciated and then held solely accountable when issues arise as a result. Micromanagement and Inefficiency: Micromanagement is a major issue. A large portion of time is spent revising decks and presentation materials with frequent, often low-value feedback, while actual execution and creative development receive far less attention. This level of oversight frequently feels more about asserting authority than improving the final product. Work-Life Balance and Communication: Feedback and change requests frequently come in late at night (between 8-10pm) with the expectation of immediate turnaround, sometimes requiring work until 12am. Much of this feedback focuses on minor details (such as kerning or cosmetic tweaks) with little regard for team members’ personal time or the actual effort required to implement changes. Leadership Quality: The supervisor I reported to lacked the experience and competence typically expected at the Director level. They demonstrated very limited understanding of production processes, creative vision/ identify potential, respecting the team and efficient workflows. This often resulted in defaulting to generic, “safe” creative directions after significant time had already been spent making decks to that persons satisfaction for their review. They were generally unreceptive to input or alternative approaches. Talented team members who showed potential were often sidelined into low-profile, menial tasks rather than given meaningful opportunities to contribute. The environment felt centered entirely around the supervisor’s personal preferences rather than doing good work, team success or professional growth. Leadership, accountability, and authenticity were noticeably lacking.