Toxic, Bottomline-First Environment - Editor HMP Global Employee Review

3.0
26 Jan 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

HMP offers a hybrid work environment (2 days in-office; 3 days remote) and free lunch one day per week. There are Summer Fridays, wherein the office closes at 1pm between Memorial Day and Labor Day. Offices typically close at 2pm the day before a company holiday as well. Employees under 5 years' tenure receive 16 days of PTO in addition to the 12 company holidays; greater than 5 years is 21 days of PTO, with an additional increase at 10 years. Benefits are standard high-deductible, with an improvement in carrier/health coverage in 2021, along with vision and dental. They also offer a basic life insurance plan, 401k, and EAP. According to the employee handbook, salaries cover 40 hours of work with 1 hour of paid lunch. This allows for some flexibility with personal appointments. Some positions allow for travel to HMP-run events. Editorial will occasionally travel to external events. Travel expenses entirely paid by HMP. There is some room for growth depending on your position and manager. Editorial positions have an opportunity to connect with thought leaders in their assigned specialty and create a great network. Company hosts yearly Christmas party and, in pre-COVID times, a summer outing to a baseball game.

Cons

HMP would rather invest in product than people. During my years with the company, HMP had multiple acquisitions without adding positions to support the rapid growth. Nearly all departments are at least 1 person short, and when employees express concern about the workload, they're told to "utilize team resources" (ie, push work onto lower-level employees) and "work on time management." Hours can be long, especially in the times leading up to events, print deadlines, or end-of-month campaign goals. As an editor, I worried about audience engagement and brand integrity when mainly publishing sales-driven content to meet client goals. I was told to work on my professionalism and drop the subject when I consistently questioned why the brand and sales did not reflect the breadth of the specialty. Another review that said brand quality are "paper-thin" is 100% accurate. The company does not offer yearly cost of living salary increases, and yearly bonuses are not guaranteed. Recognition seems to only happen for a handful of employees, with clear favoritism for certain divisions. There is a lack of transparency regarding salary bands and promotion/bonus procedures. Diversity is major weakness. The C-suite team are primarily white and male, and there is a clear pattern of hiring women at lower levels to report to men in management positions. Most of company staff is white, and there is little to no celebration of other backgrounds. Multiple office closures are based on Christian holidays plus Columbus Day (but definitely do not call it Indigenous Peoples' Day). C-Suite did not consistently follow COVID protocol (temperature check, symptom Y/N chart) when coming into the office, and they had a weak stance against mandatory COVID vaccination despite working in health care education and communications. Morale is low. The company does weekly anonymous OfficeVibe surveys, but very little change has come out of that feedback. Further, my supervisor would consistently push our scheduled 1:1 meetings to prioritize other work, which was not a great sign I would receive constructive feedback or training. When a company-wide email announced my resignation, several coworkers reached out to me to ask what happened, and two even asked if I was let go. Lastly, management regularly tries to gaslight employees. My supervisor told me they would never promise a certain promotion pay bump and that I misunderstood a conversation (even though I had post-meeting notes stating otherwise). They also hired an additional editor to my team due to managing a "rapidly growing brand" only to eliminate the position 1.5 months later, citing a need to use "shared resources" and see "revenue growth." When I said I was extremely stressed at work and exploring other employment, this person told me I should have said something sooner--blatantly ignoring the written and verbal discussions as early as 1 year prior in my 2020 performance review.

Explore other reviews about HMP Global

5.0
19 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I recently rejoined HMP Global after spending time at another organization, and my experience throughout the process has reinforced why I originally enjoyed working here. The team culture is genuinely supportive, and there’s a strong sense of collaboration and teamwork across departments. At HMP, I have experienced a positive and encouraging work environment, leadership that values employee wellness and growth, and a healthy work-life balance. I have personally found my colleagues to be both driven and approachable, which makes a huge difference in my day to day conversations. The one word I have used consistently to describe my career at HMP: Thriving!

Cons

As with any evolving organization, there can be periods of transition that require flexibility, adaptability, and understanding.

2
avatar
HMP Global Response
1mo
There is no greater compliment than having someone rejoin the organization after exploring opportunities elsewhere, and we are truly grateful to have you back as part of the team. Thank you for the feedback regarding our culture, leadership, collaboration, and the sense of support you’ve experienced throughout your career here. Hearing HMP described as a place where you have been able to “thrive” is phenomenal. We hear you on the importance of simple, streamlined processes as we continue to grow and evolve. Creating better systems, improving collaboration, and making it easier for employees to focus on achieving their goals is an important priority for us as we continue building for the future. Thank you again for your contributions, your positivity, and for being part of the HMP Global team.
2.0
30 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some genuine employees worked there.

Cons

A challenging workplace environment with inconsistent structure and support. Expectations were not always clearly communicated, and employees were often required to navigate responsibilities without sufficient training or guidance. Communication from leadership could at times feel dismissive rather than constructive, which impacted morale and overall team experience. While there were moments of effort toward improvement, the overall environment often felt disorganized and lacking in consistent support for employees.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All