Halliburton is the company that offers fast career advancement in a continuously growing industry. - Anonymous employee Halliburton Employee Review

4.0
19 May 2012
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- the reputation is a company is very good - a great place to start, continue or even switch into a new career - far above the average benefit packages - great bonus system - flexible job positioning system (move the right person to the right job) - great opportunities and fast career advancement - secured future for a lifetime

Cons

- hard labor work - long consecutive work hours and workdays - being away from family for long time - significant amount of hazards at the workplace, especially on the fields

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
12 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Teaches the fundamentals of the oil and gas industry.

Cons

Sometimes knowing the direction of the project is difficult.

1.0
18 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All