Technical Professional - Anonymous employee Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
2 May 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good medical benefits especially for people with family. Almost fix working hours, transportation provided. Base salary is good as there is no bonus. It is beneficial if you later jump to other companies that give bonus. No need to work hard as company does not recognize hard work. Managers recognize people who are good at managing their bosses.

Cons

Company is entirely profit driven. Company retrenches once there is a downturn. Company does not like to spend a single cent on anything such as D&D, team building and training. Projects get cancelled and revived every 6-12 months even during normal situation. Don't know what you are working for. Strange working hours 7.30-4.30.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
29 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
18 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All