Started with an amazing mission, but lost that light - Therapist Hazel Health Employee Review

2.0
24 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I had a really supportive supervisor and a great team. The remote flexibility gave me a good work-life balance. Working with the clients made the job feel meaningful. Great benefits overall for the full-time employees.

Cons

I was laid off with no notice, along with about 130 other staff members. There was a lack of transparency while the company was merging, so it was unclear where things were going. Clients did not receive proper closure, especially high-risk kids with significant trauma. Many immigrant clients were told their therapist had “transitioned,” with no follow-up or honesty about the layoffs. Overall, the way everything was handled felt very disorganized. Also, the caseload expectations for high and led to burnout for some clinicians.

Explore other reviews about Hazel Health

5.0
21 July 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Comp - Benefits - Team work

Cons

None that I can think of - just growing pains.

1
avatar
Hazel Health Response
11mo
We’re grateful to have you on the team and truly appreciate you sharing this feedback. It’s people like you who make Hazel such a great place to work. Thanks again for your kind words.
2.0
27 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Increased Access to Care: The platform meaningfully expands mental health access for youth and families who might otherwise go without services. The mission is genuinely impactful. Flexible Scheduling: Providers have autonomy in setting availability, which can work well for clinicians seeking supplemental income. Exposure to Diverse Clinical Presentations: Opportunity to work with a wide range of concerns in a short period of time.

Cons

High Emotional Output with Limited Containment: The pace and structure can create a “back-to-back” intensity that does not always allow adequate decompression time between high-acuity cases. Limited Continuity of Care: Short-term or platform-constrained treatment models may not be clinically appropriate for some clients presenting with more complex needs. Fit Concerns for Higher-Acuity Clients: Some clients would benefit from comprehensive evaluation, wraparound services, or in-person care that exceeds the scope of telehealth brief interventions. Minimal Clinical Community: Providers may feel isolated without strong peer consultation spaces or structured clinical case support. Sustainability Challenges: While financially helpful short-term, the model may contribute to burnout if relied upon as a primary income stream. Communication During Organizational Changes: The merger with Little Otter created uncertainty for some clinicians due to limited clarity around long-term vision, operational shifts, and provider impact. Greater transparency and proactive communication could strengthen trust and retention during transitions. I was brought on as a W-2 therapist and within a month I learned that my role, pay, and benefits would be changing. I'm sure this was known prior to my hire and if it had been communicated, I would not have accepted the position.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All