Talented team but expect long hours and no balance - Field Engineer Hensel Phelps Employee Review

3.0
19 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

For the most part, everyone is competent at their respective positions. They have some very talented and smart team members that are good to learn from. Long-term compensation is really good if you are willing to grind it out your first 5 years.

Cons

No work/life balance, 12-hour days are expected even though you are on salary, New employees are not compensated fairly for the amount of hours.

avatar
Hensel Phelps Response
1mo
We appreciate your thoughts and feedback. Hensel Phelps utilizes all reviews to help evolve our company and takes each one seriously. We want to thank you for taking the time to share your feedback with us. Hensel Phelps firmly believes that our greatest asset is our people. Hensel Phelps recognizes the importance of a great workplace and is committed to addressing any concerns that are brought to our attention.

Explore other reviews about Hensel Phelps

5.0
25 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Community, Benefits, Investment, Culture, Leadership

Cons

Work Life Balance, Long Hours

1.0
27 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Gained valuable experience working on large, fast-paced projects that helped me grow technically and professionally. I had the opportunity to learn about field operations, coordination, documentation, safety, and how major projects are managed day to day. There were also several hardworking and knowledgeable people I worked with, especially in the field, who took pride in their work and helped me learn. The experience challenged me and gave me skills that I will carry forward in my career.

Cons

One example that stood out was seeing jobsite resources used in a way that felt inappropriate. During a period when field employees were working 12+ hour days in extreme summer heat, it was observed ice from the jobsite ice machine being used to fill a cooler of beer. That created a perception that leadership priorities were disconnected from the needs of the field. Compensation fairness was another concern. In some cases, it appeared that new hires were starting at higher salaries than employees who had been with the company longer and had more experience. That created frustration and made it feel like loyalty, performance, and field experience were not always valued or rewarded fairly. There were also concerns about inconsistent accountability and the perception of favoritism. At times, it appeared that company policies were not enforced consistently across employees, which hurt trust and morale. Employees were left with the impression that personal relationships with senior supervisors could influence how situations were handled.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All