HP review - Project Manager Hensel Phelps Employee Review

1.0
20 Mar 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The health insurance is free. That would be it.

Cons

As you have read the hours are long, they will move you at a moments notice, are the pay is poor. I keep reading reviews saying that their hours are the industry standard. IT IS NOT! The grass is really greener on the other side! Currently, I work 7:30-4 Monday through Friday and NO WEEKENDS! That's right, NO WEEKENDS! I make more money than what I did at HP and my bonus was much higher than any I received! The extra added bonus, I do not have to move! It's great! There are so many upper level employees quitting because they realize that there is more out there. The golden carrot is no longer helping with retaining employees because it's not worth it. They will work you to death and when your lose to 20+ years, they will force you out. I've been so much happier and rested since I quit. Best decision I've ever made!

Explore other reviews about Hensel Phelps

5.0
3 July 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong values & great managers.

Cons

Work load can get heavy and you may relocate.

1.0
27 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Gained valuable experience working on large, fast-paced projects that helped me grow technically and professionally. I had the opportunity to learn about field operations, coordination, documentation, safety, and how major projects are managed day to day. There were also several hardworking and knowledgeable people I worked with, especially in the field, who took pride in their work and helped me learn. The experience challenged me and gave me skills that I will carry forward in my career.

Cons

One example that stood out was seeing jobsite resources used in a way that felt inappropriate. During a period when field employees were working 12+ hour days in extreme summer heat, it was observed ice from the jobsite ice machine being used to fill a cooler of beer. That created a perception that leadership priorities were disconnected from the needs of the field. Compensation fairness was another concern. In some cases, it appeared that new hires were starting at higher salaries than employees who had been with the company longer and had more experience. That created frustration and made it feel like loyalty, performance, and field experience were not always valued or rewarded fairly. There were also concerns about inconsistent accountability and the perception of favoritism. At times, it appeared that company policies were not enforced consistently across employees, which hurt trust and morale. Employees were left with the impression that personal relationships with senior supervisors could influence how situations were handled.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All