No Job is Worth Putting Yourself Through The Hunt Institute - Anonymous employee Hunt Institute Employee Review

1.0
17 Jan 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The Hunt Institute works at the system level to influence positive change for students. The organization has an explicit focus on equitable outcomes for students. You can meet high-profile stakeholders and see how policy decision-making works at the highest levels. Given turnover, there are frequent opportunities to grow your skillset.

Cons

In today's job market, you may be tempted to latch onto any job that expresses interest in you. This is not that job. You should not move across the country for this job. I watched this job impact the mental, physical, and emotional health of nearly every staff member I worked with. This job led me to experience frequent anxiety attacks. Turnover throughout my tenure was atrocious. The organization ballooned in size at a rate that it did not know how to support/sustain, leading to an overall collapse in staffing numbers as staff sought a more supportive working environment. The staff that remains is deeply overworked. Turnover was consistent across the board - with both directors and junior staff turning over so frequently, it was often difficult to keep track of who was leading which team. It is my understanding that there is no end in sight for turnover related concerns. The organization also has a (in my opinion) dated view re: remote work. A significant sticking point among the staff consistently revolved around the need to be physically in office (and live within 40 minutes or so?). Throughout my time at the organization, I watched us lose a number of high-quality staff members and leaders due to leaderships inability to be flexible to the demands of the modern labor force. While in office, employees often work siloed and there is little opportunity for collaboration, making the work in office feel like an exercise in futility. The CEO also does not consistently report to the office - creating a further rift amongst staff. Overall, the organization has a noble mission, but it is soiled by horrific leadership that cannot effectively steer the ship. Junior staff could frequently hear senior leadership screaming throughout the halls of the buildings, and stories of staff members getting screamed at were frequent. A significant number of the staff are young - on paper, this is a great experience for a young policy professional straight out of school looking to gain experience. But it is also reflective of something more sinister - older, more senior professionals know better and are less willing to put up with the stress that comes with working at The Hunt Institute. This job almost destroyed my love for education. While everyone's experiences/needs/background are different - I would encourage anyone going through the interview process for The Hunt Institute to seriously take a breath and consider all there options. I would also encourage you to reach out to any current and/or past staff via LinkedIn or other sources in your network to get an accurate representation of what it is like to work for this organization.

Explore other reviews about Hunt Institute

5.0
19 Nov 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mission-Driven Culture: The Hunt Institute’s commitment to improving education is at the center of everything it does. You feel connected to meaningful, impactful work every day. Genuine Non-Partisanship: In a time of heightened polarization, the Institute truly maintains a non-partisan approach. Decisions are guided by research, data, and what best serves students—not politics. Strong Leadership: Deputy's, Directors, Chief of Staff, and CEO are transparent, approachable, and clearly invested in both the mission and vision of Governor Hunt. They communicate priorities well and actively support employee growth. Professional Development Opportunities: Staff are encouraged to learn and take on new responsibilities. You can grow your skills and career quickly. Recently The Institute launched a Leadership Development Cohort designed to support the growth of the next set of rising leaders at the organization and support their development for more responsibilities and promotion. Meaningful External Partnerships: The Institute works closely with policymakers, and stakeholders across the country, making the work feel relevant and exciting. You will have chances to actively work with Lt. Governors, former Governors, state education leaders, and legislators from across the country.

Cons

Some staff bring their personal politics into the workplace, which can create confusion about the Institute’s nonpartisan mission. the Institute can do a better job setting expectations and supporting employees in separating their personal political beliefs from the work so that everyone shows up professionally and aligned with the organization’s role and purpose.

2
1.0
19 Feb 2026
Anonymous freelancer
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Your coworkers. Somehow this place hired genuinely good people who care about the work and each other. They deserve better.

Cons

The leadership is the problem. The CEO creates instability. Leadership's management style is disorganized and inconsistent, which creates confusion for teams trying to execute work. Strategic priorities shift without explanation. When problems arise, staff receive blame for systemic issues outside their control. The Chief of Staff position was created recently and has not improved organizational function. Communication from senior leadership often lacks professionalism. HR serves leadership interests over employee wellbeing. In one meeting, staff were advised to modify how we dress to avoid sexual harassment—placing responsibility on potential victims rather than addressing inappropriate behavior. HR also made culturally insensitive suggestions for observing Indigenous Peoples Day. The Assembly published reporting in November 2024 documenting "culture of fear" and 100% annual staff turnover. This aligns with my experience. I received positive performance reviews until I questioned a promotion decision made during a stated hiring freeze. Within one week, I was placed on a Performance Improvement Plan. Six weeks later, I was terminated for "performance issues." Financial decision-making lacks transparency. The organization discussed potential layoffs while simultaneously creating new senior positions. Staff questions about budget priorities went unanswered.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All