Company management and work environment - Senior Software Engineer In Time Tec Employee Review

2.0
6 Apr 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They are providing good package to fresher to start their career.

Cons

I have been working in ITT more than 3 years and I found lot of gapes and poor management. These are as mentioned below 1: No technical expertise in the company. No advance technologies and no proper design work in most of project. Most of Leads and Managers does not know about technical challenges in the project. Thus, they delivered poor quality to the client. 2: "Looking good" is the key factor here for growth. Employees only delegate the task to their lower layer and did not provide any help. They called this as a "growth model". They put everything on the head of fresher and watch the game from stand. 3: I did not see proper design work and architecture in most of project because technical leads does not know how to design a software. 4: Manages are occupied in one-on-one where they interfere in your personal life without your permission. If you denied to talk on your personal area, they will consider you a weak person and poke you again and again. 5: Employee performance evaluation criteria is not good. Technical experts are consider as average performer whereas "low performance employee with good relation with managers" are consider as best employee. 6: everything is talk here. No such action for progress. 7: Company is running on the concept of Landmark forum. They are doing offsite meetings with employees to brainwash their mind completely. you can only take more and more work but you can not ask for salary or role. 8: This company is hiring freshers in bulk. Good employees are resigning here every day. Company is also happy as they do not need to pay high salary to experienced candidate. They thought that fresher can do work equivalent to experience . This is the reason the project quality is not up to the mark. 9: Technology changes are happening here. If you worked on Java than your next project can be on .Net or php. 10: Covid 19 problem is not under consideration in InTimeTec. They are gathering and doing parties even after government restriction. 11: when client escalate than no one ready to take responsibility. Your leads blame on you and questioned you in a way like they are not aware about the issue. 12: even after leaving the company, people call you for the issues on which you have worked. 13: Managers can do anything in your personal life on the name of "creating abundance". They first treat like they are really take care for you. once you share your personal issues like family, relationship, friendship etc. than they will start sharing those things with your team mates without your permission. 14: No work life balance. You work till 12 in night but next day you have to login at 8.30 AM as company in very strict on sign in time (not on sign off time) Most of good reviews on glassdoor are provided by in-force as they have one project for improving the company rating. The actual reviews are coming like mentioned above.

avatar
In Time Tec Response
5y
Your feedback indicates that you faced multiple challenges, and nothing worked for you for as long as you worked with us at InTimeTec. But it is quite difficult for us to absorb the fact that you stayed in such an environment for more than three years. There’s no point for us to address your review comment in detail, as most of what you shared is factually incorrect. Still, we’d like to clear the air for you on some of the points you highlighted. To encourage and promote more comprehensive learning, we have a Technical Powerhouse with people from different domains conducting technical training for other employees. All technical leads and architects are part of this group, and they too undergo technical training if and when they switch to advance technologies. When you talk about people leaving the company, we suggest you ponder if this is just specific to InTimeTec or the process of people joining or leaving a company applies everywhere in the private sector. Not that you care, but our attrition rate remains somewhere close to 5% per quarter, which is significantly lower than the attrition rate of most IT companies in India. Be it about dealing with Covid-19 or positive reviews in Glassdoor, the data/experience you have mentioned is nowhere close to reality. It is easy to blame things out using empty rhetoric, while it would have been much easier to reach out and talk to decision-makers. With the kind of leadership environment we have at InTimeTec, the core leadership team would have done everything possible to resolve your concerns. If you were not getting the necessary support from your manager or the rest of the team, the best thing you’d have done is to speak up. Staying silent in a decisive situation not only derails the process but causes enormous frustration in an employee, which we’d sense here in your review.

Explore other reviews about In Time Tec

5.0
1 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I appreciate and am genuinely grateful to be a part of a company like In Time Tec. Just like any business, it navigates changes in the industry, economy, and the overall ebb and flow of business - but I've seen leadership navigate changes with long lead times and full transparency which I deeply respect. I've witnessed leadership sharing financials transparently, saying what it is, and making decisions as needed with people in mind - beyond what is required or expected in standard business practices.

Cons

There isn't anything that truly doesn't work for me. If there was, I'm confident I could have an open conversation with management and that we'd sort through it.

1.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Access to a handful of genuinely skilled technologists willing to share their expertise made certain stretches of this role worthwhile. If you are fortunate enough to land near one of them, absorb everything you can.

Cons

Where to begin. Leadership here is less a meritocracy than a recruitment campaign. The organization has an aggressive, almost evangelical drive to push individuals, regardless of qualification, into management roles. Declining is treated not as a professional decision, but as a loyalty test you have morally failed. The pipeline and pressure exists to grow the pyramid of leadership, and not to serve the people within it. From the point at which one declines a “leadership” position, you will be treated noticeably worse. It’s just bullying with extra steps. It should surprise no one that the most senior positions are occupied by individuals with a particular advantage over their peers: proximity to the CEO at the dinner table. Whether this reflects a deliberate strategy or simply the natural entropy of an unchecked founder, the effect on organizational credibility is the same. Speaking of the CEO, employees are periodically conscripted into the audience of what can only be described as an in-house personal development brand. Attendance at these sessions is framed as a mandatory opportunity. Though, it is not so much an opportunity as it is mandatory. On the subject of professionalism and communication standards: expectations are applied with remarkable inconsistency across the organization. High standards are selectively enforced, and the disparity is visible enough that it does not go unnoticed by those who actually meet them. Finally, and this warrants documentation, my separation from this company was recorded in a manner that directly contradicts the terms under which I resigned. I fulfilled my notice period in full. The paperwork tells a different story. I would encourage anyone considering this employer to keep meticulous records of every “professional” exchange, beginning on day one. I have additional points of feedforward. However, I’ve concluded this organization has not earned them. Frankly, I doubt they’d even be heard out, land properly, or acted upon.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All