Used to be a great place to work, poor executive leadership, ancient technology - Senior Software Engineer Infor Employee Review

2.0
5 July 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I loved my coworkers and I still miss them. The people at GT Nexus were its greatest asset. Smart and friendly. Hours are mostly flexible, but this is fairly typical of Bay Area tech companies.

Cons

Things started spiralling downward after the TradeCard merger. Some departments "won" while others "lost", and Engineering was one of the departments that "lost". Very quickly, TradeCard Engineering called all the shots and prior to and immediately after the merger, many TradeCard mid-level management were promoted to Directors and Vice Presidents while everyone on the GT Nexus (Oakland and Bangalore) side had to report to TradeCard (New York). By the time I left, most of the senior engineers had already left. Many in mid-management had left. Almost all of the original executive team had left. The Infor acquisition made things very uncertain. GT Nexus SaaS was fundamentally different than the shrink-wrap software the Infor sold. Several of the engineers in Oakland are from Bangalore on L-1 visa, which is a terrible way to exploit foreign workers. They are not paid nearly the prevailing rate as domestic engineers. The Bay Area is an incredibly expensive place to work, and I know that they are severely underpaid. But while on L-1 visa, you are stuck and can't change employers, and as far as I can tell, there is no effort on behalf of the company to convert them to H-1 or green card. The technology is ancient, mostly because of the old code. There are some half-hearted efforts to move the company to newer technologies, but this is understandably difficult with the inertia of over a decade of old code. The GT Nexus Oakland office is mostly forgotten. Employees are leaving, and there are few new hires. There was a time when IPO was a real possibility, but in the end, the company was sold to Infor, so there was no longer a reason for me to stay. I wouldn't recommend working here. There are better opportunities elsewhere.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay for area compared to other companies

Cons

Some coworkers were low quality / low tier talent

avatar
Infor Response
1w
Thank you for leaving a review. We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one!
3.0
22 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
1w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All