I worked at Infor - Senior User Experience Designer Infor Employee Review

2.0
23 Sept 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I worked as a UX Designer at Hook & Loop, Infor's design "agency." Some of the best people I have ever worked with. So much talent came through our doors. A lot of us stayed, but a lot of other designers saw the light and took better jobs elsewhere. I learned a lot from these people, and I am a better designer because of them. The office camaraderie was excellent, and we all respected each other. We worked but we had a lot of fun too. Pay and benefits were decent, and the location was perfect.

Cons

I don't have a lot of great things to say about the company itself. Hook & Loop was an experiment, and I think we spent a lot of time and energy justifying our usefulness to the executives. The first few years felt directionless, with strategies frequently shifting. I made a lot of screens for products that never made it past the demo stage. Projects seemed to move at a glacial pace. Management changed often and usually without much notice. I felt like the managers were always struggling to find their way. Layoffs totally killed morale. Also, the Koch Brothers / Koch Industries are heavily invested in Infor. So that's a thing. I didn't feel good about their politics.

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay for area compared to other companies

Cons

Some coworkers were low quality / low tier talent

avatar
Infor Response
1w
Thank you for leaving a review. We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one!
3.0
22 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
1w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All