employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Insurance Services Office

Now known as Verisk

Is this your company?

ISO Review - Software Engineer Insurance Services Office Employee Review

3.0
13 Aug 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Latest technologies to work with. Human Resource department provides good support to the employees. Diverse work force. Company do take care of employees in that they do have these team building, yoga, learning sessions now and then.

Cons

Budget constraints lead to minimal annual salary increment (last year the average salary increment in my department was almost equal to the inflation rate, so basically there was no raise at all). Hard to work up the hierarchy without compromising family life and you have to keep some people happy (not necessarily through your work) to make sure you are noticed and rewarded appropriately. Flexible work timings are actually not that flexible.

Explore other reviews about Insurance Services Office

5.0
28 Sept 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Independent worm from home w little supervision. -Opportunity for advancement -company car

Cons

Travel weekly, occasionally overnight. (Once or twice per month)

3.0
12 July 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Friendly atmosphere and flexible hours. Solid benefits package. Employees are encouraged develop as insurance professionals and not criticized for taking exams regardless of the outcome. New employees receive excellent training and more often than not good mentors when they first come to ISO.

Cons

No one has a clear understanding of how the promotion system works as you may see individuals with a distinct skill set and numerous accomplishments having the same or a lower rank than other people in the same division who are not nearly as talented or accomplished. This leads many veterans to accuse the promotion system of being more influenced by personal relationships and connections than actual performance. There is an initiative to seek out talented individuals to fast track them into management roles but the huge flaws in that logic are that a) there are few management positions available because underperforming managers are hard to eliminate no matter how many workers they may alienate b) not every good worker is suited to be a manager and c) there is no attention paid to what happens when an excellent worker gets promoted and there aren’t qualified analysts to fill their position. The lack of attention and resources directed towards the pool of talented workers who are not in management has led to many individuals burning out and becoming complacent or leaving the company as their voices are either not heard or disregarded as there have been few, if any substantive changes in procedures over the past decade.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All