Kubota Tractor - Business Systems Analyst Kubota Tractor Employee Review

4.0
20 Aug 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Kubota has worked hard at creating job opportunities and growth within the company. They have also worked at raising salaries to industry standards, and now give better annual bonuses. Great work/life balance. Hybrid working schedule, most departments work from home at least 3 days a week, if not more.

Cons

Loyalty (longevity at the company) is valued over actual work performance. Once you get hired, there are many departments where you can do no work or do a horrible job and there is no consequence. HR is very intrusive, negatively impacting departments by interfering in business related moves. HR is commonly not thought of as a resource or help by employees but instead somewhat of a threat and worry to deal with. I also feel that women are not promoted or put into management or higher positions. Predominantly male leadership.

Explore other reviews about Kubota Tractor

5.0
23 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Cares about products, customers and dealers.

Cons

Limited vision transparency from leadership team.

1.0
23 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Kubota Tractor Corporation in Grapevine provided exposure to large-scale enterprise operations and complex organizational structures

Cons

My experience at Kubota Tractor Corporation in Grapevine was deeply frustrating and ultimately disappointing. Despite holding a manager role, I had very limited authority over my own team. There was a constant disconnect between title and actual responsibility, which made it difficult to lead effectively or deliver results. Direction often came from multiple layers above, sometimes inconsistently, leaving managers in a position where accountability existed without real control. The organization also appeared to be in a rapid hiring phase without proper workforce planning. Leadership alignment was another major issue. Project expectations and priorities were not clearly or accurately communicated, which created confusion and rework. There seemed to be a gap between leadership perception and on-the-ground execution, particularly in technical areas. “At the director and VP level, there often seemed to be a gap in understanding of the underlying technical realities of the systems and projects being overseen. With the Directors, I felt that I was working with used car salesmen that were given a position of authority and asked to make technical decisions.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All