Good friendships possible, but toxic management culture prevails - Quality Inspector L3Harris Employee Review

1.0
19 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You can make a few good friends.

Cons

No flexibility. Management is very egotistical and all ways on power trips. HR really is for the company and doesn't really investigate complants about management. Benefits are expensive. If you're new just know you make more then someone that has been here for 5+ years as they change the pay scale every year. There is no room for growth. Very hard to move around unless you are a favorite. The culture is very micro managed and they encourage tattelling and back stabbing. They use a point system 15 min late or leave mor then 15 early its 1/2 a point. Miss 1 day its a point. 6 points is a verbal and a email sent to you. Stays on your record for a rolling year.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
6 Apr 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The manager was very nice, but also made sure I was learning.

Cons

The workplace was old and outdated.

2.0
5 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All