Decent - Anonymous employee L3Harris Employee Review

3.0
20 Aug 2020
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great People Nice environment for new grads.

Cons

All about money and less about the people.

avatar
L3Harris Response
5y
We agree that our people are great, whether you're a recent new graduate hire, a longtime L3Harris employee or anywhere in between! We are finding new opportunities to hear from our employees through tools like our employee engagement survey. Our semi-annual call for ideas and our internal quality program also gives us the opportunity to work with our employees to improve processes and continuously improve. Thanks for the review and we wish you the best of luck!

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
12 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work of life balance was amazing

Cons

Could run out of work due to it being contracts.

2.0
5 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All