Seek adequate compensation and work-life balance elsewhere. A good stepping stone, at best. - Software Engineer L3Harris Employee Review

2.0
24 Mar 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* COMPENSATION: Not great. Serious salary compression after merger. Underpaid by internal salary metrics, which is made available to employees. * BENEFITS: 401k has a decent 6% match. Can't say anything else is a "pro." * REMOTE WORK: Covid opened the door for remote work. Many employees continue to work remote, but it's always in danger of being revoked unless you were explicitly hired as full time remote.

Cons

* INADEQUATE COMPENSATION: Assuming excellent performance, I've observed employees leverage outside job offers with HR to get counter offers, which are funded by the cooperate retention budget rather than the merit budget. This assumes your managers will try to keep you with a counter offer. * RETENTION: Various levels of management speak regularly about the problem, but so far are unwilling to directly address salary compression and noncompetitive wages. * MERIT INCREASES: The increase to a max of ~4.5% per yr isn't nearly enough to keep up with hiring salary rates. If your salary is no longer competitive, it's best to consider employment elsewhere since hiring salaries are generally better. * LOYALTY: My experience matches the stats and studies--managers will generally exploit your loyalty. * WORK-LIFE BALANCE: My experience has been programs constantly behind schedule, lacking funding, plenty of uncompensated overtime, grueling travel with excessive hours and little to no rest. The company recently switched to 9/80 scheduling "for better work-life balance," but most higher level engineers/managers and high-performing low levels will work off-Fridays (uncompensated of course).

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
8 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
5 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All