Run, Don’t Walk Away! - Field Service Engineer Leidos Employee Review

1.0
3 Jan 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It’s a job, if you’re desperate enough.

Cons

Lousy, expensive benefits w/ a $3000 deductible. You accrue time off, but can never use it. As a Field Svc Engineer, you’re expected to be on call literally 24/7, 365 except for scheduled vacations, where a coworker does your work. When the coworker goes on vacation, you have to do his work. In December Leidos informed FSE’s that they’re taking away company cars. This represents a huge pay cut since employees will need to spend > $30k on a new vehicle to drive for work **if** they can find one. In addition, they decided to reduce mileage reimbursements for employees. You accrue vacation, but can never use it since you’re always on call & never have backup. This is an extremely high stress, high burnout job. Leidos recently acquired an unprofitable business line from L3. Since they’re losing money on the newly acquired line of business, they’re chiseling the employees with tiny merit increases, zero bonuses, benefit cost increases & taking away company cars.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All