Bottom line is important - Senior Software Engineer Leidos Employee Review

3.0
25 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Depending on where you work, your coworkers can be great, and the flexibility is awesome. Diversity and inclusion are fantastic. Plenty of opportunities to move around in the company My direct team and managers were top of the line awesome.

Cons

Even though Leidos has money to blow, you feel limited only by what your direct team does as far as reaping the rewards of the company as a whole if your sector isn’t as profitable. I felt like the bottom line mattered more than my needs. The shareholder’s gains felt more important than ensuring I was taken care of. Also the stress of billable hours was not something I ever thought was a thing. God forbid somebody chat with you about non-work related things for 30 minutes, and now you have to either lie and charge that time to a project, or stay at work 30 minutes later. Also, the benefits seemed to slowly get taken away the time I was there. There was an employee suggestion box that we got to “vote” on that was always featured on the front page of the intranet (Prism) and then that was shoved away into a hard to find place once enough people brought up real issues that couldn’t be fixed, as it would cost the shareholders money. Higher ups would respond if there were enough votes, then they took the voting function away. That was probably one of the most demoralizing things.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
4 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay, Work flexibility, PTO, Flexible time bank, floating holidays

Cons

The way they PTO is kinda weird now where you essentially have to make up the hours to took PTO or something like that? It’s weird but it’s a recent change.

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All