It was a Weird Experience - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

1.0
4 June 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It could have been an interesting transition.

Cons

I was with SAIC for nearly 29 years when my project went to Leidos as part of the "gentleman's agreement" that split the company. As far as I was concerned the split was handled very poorly with very little communication about what it meant. The upshot was that if I had remained with Leidos I would have kept my service time, but what was not told was that if a Leidos employee went back to SAIC that they would lose it; those who were with SAIC, however, and moved to Leidos would keep theirs. Anyway, my project imploded and I was forced to find new work. Given that there was a partial government shutdown, a corporate HR that was being stood up, it was just a mess. I went back to SAIC after 2.5 weeks as a Leidos employee and guess what: I lost my service time (which meant that nearly 30 years of service DID NOT COUNT for anything and I had to start all over again as a BRAND NEW employee!!!

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, supportive management, encouragement for self development

Cons

Some decisions move too slowly.

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All