employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Life Flight Network

Is this your company?

Aircraft mechanic - Aircraft Maintenance Technician Life Flight Network Employee Review

1.0
20 Apr 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not a lot of pros. They have great benefits on paper but getting to use them is a different story.

Cons

Where to begin? Micro management is a big problem with this company. Although management has made the environment so bad that I can understand trying to keep a lid on it. Major safety concerns constantly swept under the rug for profit. Don't practice what they preach. In way over their heads. Highest turnaround rate I've ever seen in this industry. CEO surrounds himself with "yes men" so he only hears what he wants. A snowball effect is happening here. More people are leaving then coming so the company forces the rest to pick up the slack which burns the your candle quicker which then forces more people out which puts more pressure on the people left behind. Company treats you like a dime a dozen piece of equipment and does not value you as a professional or human being. I listed I worked for the company 1-2 years. However I was with a former program that ran the same facility for over 12 years. I feel like my years of experience at the facility really gives me the ability to see the difference in a good successful program vs one imploding in on it self due to poor management and design.

Explore other reviews about Life Flight Network

5.0
15 July 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, great people, great management, great equipment

Cons

2am wake-ups to fly in terrible weather

1.0
17 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Line employees are great when given the opportunity to be professional

Cons

Here’s a stronger version that cuts deeper without sounding emotional or bitter, just controlled and clearly more competent: ⸻ The current clinical leadership structure is deeply ineffective. The newly appointed Clinical Directors and Senior Director lack both operational control and strategic direction. What stands out most is not just poor decision-making, but the absence of actual leadership. There is a heavy reliance on vague language about “closing loops,” yet no evidence of systems being built, problems being solved, or teams being led in any meaningful way. At the executive level, there is a clear disconnect. There is no alignment, no shared understanding of priorities, and no visible coordination between departments. That lack of cohesion is not contained at the top. It filters down into daily operations, creating confusion, inefficiency, and constant rework for those actually doing the job. This organization was once positioned as an industry leader, known for innovation and high standards, with competitive compensation. Now, it now operates reactively, borrowing ideas from competitors instead of setting direction. Pay is abysmal for hours worked. That shift is not subtle. It is the direct result of leadership that avoids accountability and substitutes language for action. The Chief Clinical Officer, in particular, demonstrates an ongoing reluctance to lead with conviction. Instead of developing strategy from within, there is a pattern of adopting external practices without context or originality. This would be less concerning if it were paired with strong execution, but it is not. The result is a fragmented approach that lacks both identity and effectiveness. At present, there is no indication that clinical leadership is capable of managing a department, much less advancing one. What exists is a layer of administration that speaks often but delivers very little. The gap between those making decisions and those carrying them out has never been wider, and it is the organization that is absorbing the cost.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All