employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Part of MIT

Engaged employer

Diverse and interesting work for national defense - Member Of Technical Staff MIT Lincoln Laboratory Employee Review

4.0
23 Jan 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Continuous learning encouraged with opportunities galore * Diverse project landscape * Interesting and competent colleagues * Reasonable levels of self direction, and lateral moves within org are possible

Cons

* Performance assessment and pay raises very political * High pressure environment, sometimes too fast paced * Some groups have too many projects, people get spread thin supporting too many * Organization often accepts more $$/projects than it can reasonably execute well

Explore other reviews about MIT Lincoln Laboratory

5.0
3 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It can vary a lot from group to group, but in general, wonderful place with wonderful people and lots of interesting work going on. Excellent benefits and lots of flexibility to explore different projects.

Cons

Little opportunity for advancement in terms of rank and compensation once you reach technical staff. Additionally (again varies from group to group) expectations of what a staff member does can be unclear and there can be a light sink-or-swim nature to the work, again depending on the group you're in.

4.0
17 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worked with some of the smartest people I’ve ever known. Great opportunities to learn from your coworkers and an atmosphere that encourages learning, including a well-run technical education program. Fabulous support staff and technicians that can get seemingly impossible things done quickly. Great resources and lab spaces (if a bit dated). The nature of the work encourages good work/life balance. Fantastic benefits (though the pay is low).

Cons

No/limited opportunities for advancement makes this a hard place to work mid-career. Good engineers are promoted to be mediocre managers. Every program is under-funded, under-staffed, and over schedule. Bad managers are shuffled around but rarely fired.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All