employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Part of MIT

Engaged employer

A place for a lifelong career - Group Leader MIT Lincoln Laboratory Employee Review

5.0
16 June 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Technical excellence, technical rigor, flat management structure. This is one of the few places left where collaborative applied research on real, important problems, is carried out on a routine basis. Senior members of staff are nurturing to younger staff members. An excellent middle ground between pure academia and industrial R&D.

Cons

Due to flat structure, "title promotions" do not really exist. The structure is akin to the old "Bell Labs" paradigm, where you could have a full career as a staff member.

Explore other reviews about MIT Lincoln Laboratory

5.0
3 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It can vary a lot from group to group, but in general, wonderful place with wonderful people and lots of interesting work going on. Excellent benefits and lots of flexibility to explore different projects.

Cons

Little opportunity for advancement in terms of rank and compensation once you reach technical staff. Additionally (again varies from group to group) expectations of what a staff member does can be unclear and there can be a light sink-or-swim nature to the work, again depending on the group you're in.

4.0
17 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worked with some of the smartest people I’ve ever known. Great opportunities to learn from your coworkers and an atmosphere that encourages learning, including a well-run technical education program. Fabulous support staff and technicians that can get seemingly impossible things done quickly. Great resources and lab spaces (if a bit dated). The nature of the work encourages good work/life balance. Fantastic benefits (though the pay is low).

Cons

No/limited opportunities for advancement makes this a hard place to work mid-career. Good engineers are promoted to be mediocre managers. Every program is under-funded, under-staffed, and over schedule. Bad managers are shuffled around but rarely fired.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All