Pros
Good culture within the engineering departments to share knowledge and teach, including across functions, very collaborative in that sense. Good place to learn. Ability to have ownership and impact early in career. Going above and beyond is generally noticed, with exception of course. Experiences vary widely across departments and projects, reviews can be misleading since the company is broken into 3 distinct business units (PAS, Naval, and Space) and I can only speak to PAS. Fast paced, trial by fire sometimes. Very competent engineering managers who are actually on your team and advocate for / defend you. Have not experienced or observed micromanagement. Very good PTO and flexibility in hours depending on manager. Flexibility meaning leave early today and make up the hours tomorrow, assuming you coordinate such that you aren't missed.
Cons
All functions are spread too thin, making it hard to get inputs or resources you need in a timely manner. This leads to a steady stream of fires that need to be put out, that were almost always avoidable. Company is playing catch-up with its processes and tools, pretending to be a big company while still operating with a lot of small company quirks. That can be good or bad depending on what you are looking for, but leads to confusion on responsibilities and processes. Company is taking on exciting new projects but not scaling the engineering teams to match the pace of the work coming in The teams are growing, don't want to exaggerate that point, but in a frustrating stage where people do not have time to teach or get others up to speed. Trial by fire, also a con