employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Mavis Tutorial Centre

Is this your company?

Read at the genuine, heartfelt, sincere reviews, not the 5 star reviews with 5 word minimum for pros and cons - Teacher Mavis Tutorial Centre Employee Review

1.0
6 Sept 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You have a job and decent leave when the centre is closed - around 5 weeks a year

Cons

- Enrolment is everything (According to this company, you are a good teacher if you have high enrolment and bad teacher if you have low enrolment. There is an enrolment expectation, and you will be considered to be not meeting expectations as long as you don't meet this number, even if your enrolment is increasing (or not dropping) month after month.) - Possible 6 day work week or pay cut if you don't meet enrolment expectations - Possible change of contract if you don't meet enrolment expectations - Students from different streams (including special needs) may be in your class - Barely any medical benefits

Explore other reviews about Mavis Tutorial Centre

4.0
14 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Love it, couldn't be better

Cons

New hires are terribly screened

1.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Opportunity to gain teaching experience and work with students from different backgrounds. * Some colleagues and students were supportive and enjoyable to work with.

Cons

* Teachers on medical leave were at times expected to continue conducting lessons remotely instead of proper relief arrangements being made. * Student withdrawals were often reflected negatively on teachers even when the reasons were unrelated to teaching quality, such as relocation or scheduling conflicts. * There was insufficient onboarding and handover support provided to new staff at the start of employment. * Communication and management style varied significantly across centres, and some interactions with management felt dismissive or unprofessional. * Contributions outside the curriculum scope did not always feel acknowledged or valued. * Teacher performance appeared to be measured heavily based on class enrolment numbers rather than overall teaching quality and effort. * HR response times for clarifications and administrative matters could be improved.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All