Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      McKesson

      Engaged employer

      McKesson reviews

      Toxic IT org - Manager McKesson Employee Review

      1.0
      22 June 2026
      Manager
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      People who are committed to doing good work and improving patient outcomes. Free coffee. Cafeteria in office.

      Cons

      Toxic politics. It all seems to be emanating from IT Management. People who have only been with the company for a few months with all of the best ideas that they have not actually implemented. Add fuel to the fire are the operations VPs who have also only been with the company a few months acting like everything is so horrible and no one has actually done any good work. LeadRx and iLead are not worth the paper they are printing on with this level of toxic behaviour.

      avatar
      McKesson Response
      4d
      Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.

      Explore other reviews about McKesson

      5.0
      28 May 2026
      Field sales development representative
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Great benefits, culture, and work-life balance

      Cons

      No cons to report on the company.

      avatar
      McKesson Response
      3w
      Thank you for your review! We’re so glad your experience at McKesson has been a great one. Together, we are shaping the future of health for our patients, our communities, our people, and you.
      1.0
      3 June 2026
      Anonymous employee
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

      Cons

      1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

      1
      avatar
      McKesson Response
      3w
      Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
      See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All
      Related searches: McKesson jobs | McKesson salaries | McKesson benefits | McKesson interviews | McKesson conversations
      McKesson reviewsMcKesson Manager reviewsMcKesson review