Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      McKesson

      Engaged employer

      McKesson reviews

      Not good - Anonymous employee McKesson Employee Review

      1.0
      7 Sept 2025
      Anonymous employee
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Compensation was competitive, and the product/service had potential in the market.

      Cons

      The workplace culture, especially in the sales division, was extremely unprofessional and at times felt unsafe. Conferences and off-site meetings often included inappropriate behavior that went unchecked by leadership. Boundaries were not respected, and there was a general atmosphere of permissiveness that made it difficult to feel secure or supported. Leadership, particularly at the VP level, fostered a toxic environment through intimidation, favoritism, and dismissiveness. Concerns brought forward were either ignored or met with hostility. HR seemed either overwhelmed or unwilling to address ongoing issues, creating a culture where accountability was lacking.

      avatar
      McKesson Response
      9mo
      Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.

      Explore other reviews about McKesson

      5.0
      24 June 2026
      Senior business analyst
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Competitive pay and bonuses are huge since Covid

      Cons

      Technology leadership has high turnover

      1.0
      3 June 2026
      Anonymous employee
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

      Cons

      1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

      1
      avatar
      McKesson Response
      3w
      Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
      See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All
      Related searches: McKesson jobs | McKesson salaries | McKesson benefits | McKesson interviews | McKesson conversations
      McKesson reviewsMcKesson review