Coup de grâce - Project Manager Meyer Davis Employee Review

1.0
22 June 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

High profile projects in exciting destinations Exceptional chief operating officer

Cons

Overall "luxury" design aesthetic not as made to measure as website touts No sense of urgency from owners, blasé attitude, non-extant transference of crucial information received from clients to owners to any other team members Office space extremely disorganised and over-crowded Director level under experienced for their role and not exposed to working at any other office, no international experience, very poor management related responsibilities such as poor establishment of objectives and priorities Director level performance and behaviour fell very short of required standard for their positions, including, but not limited to the following: 1 ) ineffective staff allocation and scheduling tasks 2) poor demonstration in ability to anticipate and resolve problems 3) poor ability to adapt to changes and contribute to effective use of resources 4) not effective in delegating work 5) very poor analysis for corrective measure for financial deviations as they pertain to contracts (change orders) 6) poor communication skills both internal transparency and as it related to their display of oral and written communication skills 7) poor ability to present information in a clear and concise way 8) undependable and unreliable attendance and punctuality 9) inability to meet established schedules and deadlines -- submissions were often late 10) poor follow up with team work progress 11) poor interaction and negative relationships with peers and junior staff 12) poor cooperation 13) ineffective team building skills 14) people not treated with respect 15) failure to learn appropriate new-work related skills and procedures from those more experienced 16) very poor supervision of employees in terms of training, guiding and assisting junior staff 17) lack of motivation for employees to perform effectively 18) inability to resolve personnel-related problems effectively 19) poor design decision making such as sound, practical and workable design solutions, very inconsistent logic, often contradictory with subsequent iterations 20) general lack of technical skills from interior architectural knowledge and FF&E skill set to lack of control of design process Unfortunately, one is required to mark at least one "star" above otherwise I would have marked zero.

Explore other reviews about Meyer Davis

5.0
7 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great talented people, cool projects

Cons

None that I can think of

2.0
26 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Opportunity to work on dynamic projects, and the baseline design concepts have potential. Great projects

Cons

- Lack of Leadership and Communication: Upper management and directors fail to communicate effectively with Project Managers. For example, staffing decisions are discussed in silos without looping in the PMs, leading to massive confusion, micromanagement, and a disjointed workflow. - Inexperienced Management: The leadership team lacks the necessary management capability to run an office smoothly, resulting in a culture that feels reactive rather than strategic, with unnecessary drama spreading across regional teams (including NY). - No Boundaries with Clients: Leadership allows clients to constantly shift goalposts and run circles around the design team without stepping in to protect scope, timeline, or staff sanity. Workspace Environment: The physical office setup lacks privacy, creating an overcrowded, high-stress environment where it feels like everyone is working on top of each other. - Accountability: There is a widespread lack of project ownership among team members, leaving those who care to shoulder the weight.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All