Growth is not based on Skills and capabilities - Anonymous employee NIH Employee Review

2.0
1 Oct 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A lot of possibilities to advance the mission of NIH and public health. It's really a good feeling to be part of the mission.

Cons

While mission of NIH is really great, working to achieve it through corrupt hiring has made it close to impossible. The fact that NIH can get any work done is a miracle with type of workers and managers running the show. Is everyone bad? No these are good people. Some are bad and know how to work the system others are just enjoying the ride by doing minimum. With no real way to be replaced, US tax payers continue to pay the salaries of unskilled and nonperforming workers. These nonperforming workers get promoted to managers by their friends. Hiring is not fair. Federal employees lack the skills to do the job and so contractors hired to do the work. Some contractors have been there for years. These contractors act and behave like federal employees. Federal employee who supposed to provide oversight become friends with contractors and fail to provide proper oversight resulting in waste of public funds. Discrimination and nepotism is wide spread. Hiring by unskilled managers results in hiring unskilled federal and contract staff. Even the internship hiring is corrupt by hiring family and/or friends.

Explore other reviews about NIH

5.0
26 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not stressful, science based, not profit.

Cons

Slow processes, too many meetings.

4.0
25 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with the some of the smartest scientists and clinicians in the world. So many learning opportunities. Kind patients. Allowed time to care for patients as there is no pressure of quotas by health insurance.

Cons

Nursing management can be verbally abusive with frequent retaliation and intimidation. As most older nurses have worked there for most of their career, they are dismissive of new perspectives and resistant to evidence-based practice.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All