Pros
The guy that was my supervisor/boss/manager was pretty cool...until he became a by-the-books guy...then he and his supervisor quit within 3 months.
Cons
Oh dear, this place gave me a headache from day #1. I was so happy to leave the company that I had previously been tormented/working at that I didn't take much of second to look up reviews and research this company. Wow, that was a major mistake.
My first few weeks at the company were ok, nothing special, nothing memorable, definitely not fun. I slowly became accustomed to the "Nason way of doing things" and kept receiving my paycheck on time.
Well...prior to my arrival, there were a few others that had my title and every time I had to speak with vendors, owners, etc. they would mention and refer to the revolving door that is Nason. These people also commented on how I wouldn't last long either...and they were correct.
There weren't any working telephones for months on end in the Philadelphia office, so when we had bids (or any calls for that matter) come in, it wouldn't ring anywhere...and people thought we were out of business!!
There was no IT department. Management decided it would be best to outsource it. I still laugh at this...and what I was told they were paying for it.
They cut back on office supplies to save their budget. This meant down-grading coffee, not having enough pens, tablets, hand towels, soap...and it took months to decide to purchase a water cooler.
The building was old and not maintained properly. Management would shrug and laugh when something broke. We had lost internet because our ISP failed to install lines correctly, plumbing would back up due to the water table (yes, the office smelled like poo), there was no hot water, the building was poorly insulated and HVAC not balanced...making it very uncomfortable at times.
It didn't matter your job title, if somebody wanted to do your work, they did it. Even if they work out of the Maryland office and have no experience doing what the job entailed. Guess who was suppose to fix the situation and be accountable for the mistakes that ensued? Yup. For a moment in time, files were password protected to protect the innocent ones.
The "people in charge" had/have no idea what they are doing most of the time. Try to get advice? Who do you ask? I would actually ask people outside the company (and Google)! The titles given/assigned were more often that not inflated to replace the immediate need for a salary raise.
For as long as I can remember, they were not performing background checks or drug screens. This showed in their choice of newcomers. It was quite embarrassing to turn around to our client and explain why we had to make sudden staffing changes once we found out about some undesirable criminal histories.
At my departure of the company, I was on my 4th boss in 6 months (not my tenure, was there longer).
