employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

National Renewable Energy Lab

Is this your company?

top-heavy and "it's who you know" culture - Anonymous employee National Renewable Energy Lab Employee Review

1.0
18 Sept 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

competitive pay and benefits. Several "silos" actually have good managers

Cons

If you enter NREL with a goal of making a difference, you're going to be in for a disappointment. While the place employs top-notch scientists, its matrixed structure and extreme aversion to any change will soon dishearten you. The organization is very top-heavy. Nepotism and cronyism flourish. The operations side (Finance, Site Ops) is poorly run, and actually prefers to distance itself from "the tile" people. It's who you know, not what you know. Shrinking funding leads to "diversifying funding base", which is a euphemism for having to look for your own funding instead of doing the job you were hired to do.

Explore other reviews about National Renewable Energy Lab

5.0
11 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Growth opportunities, manager was good

Cons

No cons come to mind

4.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Incredibly talented, dedicated, intelligent personnel who are highly motivated by the mission. Great opportunities to work collaboratively in a campus-like environment. Reasonable flexibility on work location, with options for remote, hybrid, and on-site work (depending on role and requirements). Good benefits. Fairly diverse workforce for the area (Colorado, USA) with many researchers from other nations. It's a good name to have on your CV if you're an energy researcher.

Cons

Funding is reliant on Congressional whims, and with current administration's aversion to anything renewable, sustainable, or strategic, the risk of layoffs is very high. Leadership team is mostly senior researchers who have peaked but still want to do research and are not effective "business" managers. Communication from LT to staff is pretty much one-way and not always transparent. Typical bottlenecks in getting LT attention. LT expresses interest in operating more efficiently but does not devote real resources to supporting that objective. Silos between business management systems persist. Risk management model is immature (projects, systems, institutional) and most decisions seem to be made based on intuition rather than data. Some progress on diversity representation in management but it's been very slow.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All