Toxic environment - Senior Software Engineer Natixis Employee Review

2.0
1 Oct 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Colleagues are friendly and the office is quite cool.

Cons

The insistence in having a mandatory hybrid, 2-day-in-office system is already demodé, but to double-down on it and have a MANAGER just to check if you're going or not is really ridiculous. Politics, power-plays, a culture where no one is responsible for their own mistakes, but everyone wants to be the sole winners, it's very toxic and it gets old pretty fast. Communication between the teams is non-existent, specially because there's no agreement on which LANGUAGE should everyone use! French? English? Portuguese? KLINGON?! It's an international company, with international clients, and, sorry, but the DE FACTO international language, you like it or not, IS ENGLISH. ALL meeting should be carried on in English. Every document should have an English version. Every day-to-day communication should be carried on in English. Otherwise, start hiring people with FRENCH language skills and forget about internationalization, and just say the company is a FRENCH company.

avatar
Natixis Response
1y
Thank you for leaving us a review. In Natixis, we truly appreciate feedback and transparency. It is key for us to have a clear vision of our employees’ insights and ideas, so we can create an increasingly better environment within our company. For this reason, we invite you to discuss your perspective with HR and/or your manager. Natixis appreciates your time.

Explore other reviews about Natixis

5.0
24 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice people Work life balance

Cons

None everything is great !

1.0
11 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A lot of easy transportation options.

Cons

I'll be direct: Natixis CIB's management has a serious disconnect from market reality, and a recent job posting ("IT compliance and finance manager") is a perfect example of it. They are advertising an L1 IT management role — a squad lead position — with a requirement list that would challenge a senior director at a top-tier bank. Python, SQL, Informatica, Business Objects, Power BI, Easymorph, Sybase, CI/CD, Agile, data modeling, requirements gathering, budget management, Steerco presentations, compliance oversight, and direct people management — all in one role, all expected simultaneously. The compensation attached to this does not come close to reflecting that scope. Not even close. This isn't an isolated posting. It reflects how Natixis routinely structures roles: overload the job description, underpay the hire, and then use performance management as a pressure valve when the person — predictably — can't do everything. I have personally seen talented, experienced managers placed into roles like this and then PIPs'd out when they couldn't deliver the impossible. The PIP process here is not a development tool. It is an exit mechanism dressed up in HR language. Leadership operates in a top-down, Paris-driven model that is slow to change and resistant to accountability. Decisions that should take days take months. Technology choices lag the industry by years — the tools listed in this posting (Informatica, Business Objects, Easymorph) tell you everything you need to know about the modernization roadmap. If you are a strong IT manager with real skills and real options, do not take this role at the pay they are offering. You will be stretched thin, undervalued, and held accountable for systemic failures that predate you. The market will pay you significantly more for less frustration.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All