Talented professionals deserve better - toxic management culture - Anonymous employee Neurons Employee Review

1.0
14 Aug 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great product with real potential CEO Thomas Ramsøy is genuinely talented and visionary Some genuinely good people in various departments Modern office space

Cons

Uninspiring office location in Høje Taastrup - far from Copenhagen's tech scene and cultural amenities Extremely toxic management culture across multiple levels Poor leadership decisions that prioritize personal preferences over performance No proper feedback mechanisms - high performers terminated without warning Nepotism and favoritism are prevalent throughout the organization "Soft firing" tactics used instead of honest performance management Employees live in fear of arbitrary termination High turnover rate, especially among talented individuals Management creates an environment where you can't trust colleagues Multiple talented professionals found significantly better opportunities within 3-4 months of leaving. If you're considering Neurons, be aware that performance doesn't protect you. The company loses great talent due to poor people management, not business challenges

Explore other reviews about Neurons

1.0
1 July 2020
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fast-paced environment with interesting projects and clients. The CEO is extremely intelligent and known in the industry so you can learn a lot from working with him.

Cons

Low salary, no benefits, no possibility for advancement, employees are micromanaged and treated like children with very strict rules (short and fixed breaks, no social media usage, etc etc). Management requires you to work as much as possible but they are not similarly flexible with employees.

2
1.0
12 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people are great. There are a lot of talented and hardworking colleagues who genuinely care about doing a good job and helping each other. Strong and interesting product.

Cons

There is a lack of transparency from leadership, which can make it difficult to understand decisions and company direction. A small group of high performers often ends up carrying a large share of the workload, while performance expectations don’t seem to be applied consistently across the organization. Burnout is a real issue, and many employees seem to be struggling, but it often feels like the problem is not fully acknowledged or addressed. Low performers appear to remain in place for long periods without much accountability, which means others are left to pick up the slack.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All