A mess behind the scenes - Pet Care Specialist Petropolitan Employee Review

1.0
24 Feb 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with dogs can be rewarding. A couple coworkers genuinely care about the animals. A decent option for young workers (19 and under) who won’t be held to the same standards or expected to work as hard as others.

Cons

Severe Understaffing: The facility is extremely understaffed, often leaving only 3-4 employees responsible for 50+ dogs, cleaning duties, and closing tasks. This compromises both employee well-being and the personal care dogs receive. Neglect & Lack of Enrichment for Dogs: Dogs are frequently left unattended, and enrichment is practically nonexistent. The environment is dull, and attempts to introduce toys or stimulation are discouraged. Rather than working with dogs on behavioural challenges, staff are trained to resort to immediate crating, leash corrections, or even bark collars—often without owner knowledge or prior consent. Dishonest Social Media & Report Cards: The image portrayed to clients is misleading. Photos and report cards only highlight positive moments, often omitting signs of stress, excessive crating, or behavioral issues that occurred during the day. Unfair & Sketchy Tip Policy: Employees are promised tips after three months but may not receive them unless they specifically ask. Some workers (even top-performing ones) were excluded from the tip pool for months, only receiving them after raising concerns. Tips also remain suspiciously consistent paycheck to paycheck, (exactly $52.50 three checks in a row) raising questions about transparency in distribution. Discriminatory & Exploitative Practices: Employees from immigrant backgrounds are unfairly given extra work, misled about visa sponsorship assistance, and MAJORLY undervalued. Despite being told they were among the hardest workers, they were denied the same benefits as others included days off. Toxic Management & Lack of Communication: Supervisors avoid holding scheduled meetings, fail to communicate important accommodations (such as medical restrictions), and specifically the managers foster an unapproachable work environment. Employees who voice concerns are dismissed or ignored completely. Inconsistent Standards for Staff: Younger employees are openly held to lower expectations, resulting in uneven workloads where senior staff are forced to take on extra responsibilities without recognition or support. Poor Food Quality & Services: The “hot lunch power bowls” marketed to clients consist of clunky/hard reheated frozen rice, canned meat (often cold from the fridge), and pumpkin (often watery from also coming out of the freezer). Basic services like tooth brushing and brushing are often rushed or skipped due to time constraints due to understaffing. Final Thoughts:If you are considering working here, be prepared for extreme workloads, painfully low pay without tips, and no real support from management. If you are a pet parent, be aware that the environment is not as advertised—both in terms of the experience for dogs and the treatment of staff. There is a reason staff turnover is so high. Employees who genuinely care about dogs and put in extra effort are overlooked, while dishonesty and disorganisation run the facility. I left because I could no longer justify the unethical treatment of both workers and animals. Proceed with caution.

Explore other reviews about Petropolitan

3.0
1 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Love the people, animals and environment with community involved

Cons

Lower paying and entry level job than expected, can get burnt out very easily especially during busy times of the year. Client interactions are either wonderful or horrid, can’t please everyone

1.0
14 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lovely supervisors, the staff members are all such hard working, and lovely people. They carry this place, and are the reason it is still functioning.

Cons

Firstly, please read the review from February 2024 — I truly could not have said it better. Sadly, and painfully, absolutely nothing has changed. I was employed at The Petropolitan for just over a year. I stayed far longer than I should have because I cared deeply about the dogs and the team beside me. What I witnessed still weighs heavily on me, and I write this with genuine remorse for the dogs who cannot speak for themselves. The Petropolitan does an incredible job of creating a façade. From the outside, everything looks polished, attentive, and loving. Behind the scenes, the reality is far more troubling. Concerns regarding dog welfare and honesty with clients: - There is both a day care and boarding facility. The day care has four rooms divided by energy and needs. Dogs deemed “too much work” or incompatible are frequently crated for hours at a time. - There is an entire room filled with crates where dogs often receive little to no interaction, largely due to chronic understaffing. There are sometimes only 2 staff members on shift to manage 60+ dogs. - Staff members, many of whom are overwhelmed, forget or deprioritize returning dogs to play, sometimes leaving them crated for excessive periods. - Dogs who visibly do not enjoy the environment are still kept as clients. This is not communicated honestly. - Report cards are fabricated to reflect a “great day,” regardless of the dog’s actual emotional state. - Dogs showing clear signs of stress — constant barking, distress behaviours, and ongoing stress-related gastrointestinal issues — are described to owners as “happy” and “settled.” This is seen far too frequently in boarding. “Personal Care” services are deeply misleading: - Clients pay extra for one-on-one care, yet these dogs are often crated for nearly the entire day. - On many days, personal care dogs receive two brief five-minute walks and, if fortunate, 10–15 minutes in a playroom, much of which is spent staging photos. - The interaction is often reduced to photo-taking for report cards, not meaningful engagement. - There were days I managed the entire boarding department alone, leaving personal care dogs isolated in separate rooms for the duration of what was supposed to be enrichment time. This genuinely broke my heart. Boarding conditions and misrepresentation: - The so-called “large” accommodations are extremely small, tightly packed into small two rooms. - I worked primarily in boarding and effectively ran the department without the title, support, or pay. - Dogs who hated their stay, visibly and consistently, were still described to owners as having “a great time.” Additional concern: chronic overbooking and accommodation misrepresentation. - Boarding is consistently overbooked, with far more dogs accepted than there are appropriate accommodations available. - Dogs booked and paid for “large accommodations” are regularly placed instead in 'large' crates, including crates located in hallways and in the overflow room. - Dogs booked into “luxury suites” are not guaranteed those suites. Placement operates on a first-come, first-served basis. - When luxury suites are full, dogs who have paid for them are crated until a suite becomes available, sometimes for extended periods. - This practice is not communicated honestly to clients at booking, drop-off, or in report cards. - From a welfare perspective, this adds unnecessary stress to dogs already coping with a boarding environment. - From a client perspective, it is fundamentally misleading — pet parents believe they are paying for guaranteed space and comfort when, in reality, accommodations are conditional and often unavailable. - Pet parents deserve full transparency about where their dogs will actually be housed, especially when premium services are being paid for. - The lack of honesty surrounding overbooking and accommodations is deeply concerning and, in my experience, systemic rather than occasional. - Management avoided difficult but necessary conversations with clients unless pushed repeatedly. Operational dishonesty: - “Seasonal gourmet treats” are advertised, yet ingredients are never available. Staff are instructed to make something random and invent ingredient lists. - Report cards are the primary concern of management, often prioritized over actual care and interaction. - I felt immense pressure to produce an excellent report card rather than spend a reasonable, loving amount of time with a dog. Workplace culture and leadership failures: - Supervisors and co workers were genuinely wonderful, hardworking, and compassionate, they carry this place, and they are severely underpaid and unappreciated. - The manager is deeply toxic, instilling fear of job loss for anyone who disagrees or suggests improvements. - In an entire year, I never once saw her work hands-on with the animals. She once asked me how boarding operations functioned. - Peer reviews about her were overwhelmingly negative, yet there were no repercussions. - Management routinely went behind staff members’ backs, firing people without notice, creating a culture of anxiety and silence. Unequal treatment, discrimination, and emotional harm: - I believe there is discrimination toward international workers such as myself. Approved vacation was later weaponized against me. - I experienced an Ambiguous loss and had asked for family time way in advance, which was then denied later, despite explaining its obvious importance to me and my family. - I was held to an unusual and unfairly high standard, bullied over sick notes after a single day off, and pressured to disclose deeply personal information. - A staff member caught the manager googling how to “punish me.” When raised, I was gaslit and told it was justified. - Despite showing up consistently and being praised by supervisors for professionalism, I was never genuinely appreciated. My departure: - When I was suddenly removed from the schedule and replaced quietly with new hires, I recognized the plan to terminate me without notice. - Knowing my supervisors would never approve, the decision was hidden from them. - I resigned first — and the letter of recommendation I received only confirmed that management, not performance, is the problem. - I later realized I had been used through December, denied time with family who spent thousands to visit me, only to be pushed out afterward. Final thoughts: - The core issue here is leadership. The owner and manager either cannot or will not acknowledge their failures. Employee reviews all echo the same concerns — this is not coincidence. - If you are a pet parent, proceed with caution. - If you are an animal care worker, protect your mental health. There are better places — places that truly care for animals and the people who look after them. This is not one of them.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All